Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Single-Level Spinal Procedures A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Analysis in a National Longitudinal Database

被引:44
作者
Cole, Tyler [1 ]
Veeravagu, Anand [1 ]
Zhang, Michael [1 ]
Li, Alexander [1 ]
Ratliff, John K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
关键词
intraoperative neuromonitoring; neurological complications; spine surgery; ACDF; fusion; laminectomy; discectomy; payments; geographic variation; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; MONITORING MIOM; LUMBAR FUSION; PART; 15; SURGERY; MOTOR; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000593
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective propensity score-matched analysis on a national database (MarketScan) between 2006 and 2010. Objective. To compare rates of neurological deficits after elective single-level spinal procedures with and without intraoperative neuromonitoring, as well as associated payment differences and geographic variance. Summary of Background Data. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring is a technique that may contribute to avoiding permanent neurological injury during some spine surgery procedures. However, it is unclear whether all patients undergoing spine surgery benefit from neuromonitoring. Methods. An identified 85,640 patients underwent single-level spinal procedures including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), lumbar fusion, lumbar laminectomy, or lumbar discectomy. Neuromonitoring was identified with appropriate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Cohorts were balanced on baseline comorbidities and procedure characteristics using propensity score matching. Trauma and spinal tumors cases were excluded. Results. Patients (12.66%) received neuromonitoring intraoperatively. Lumbar laminectomies had reduced 30-day neurological complication rate with neuromonitoring (0.0% vs. 1.18%, P = 0.002). Neuromonitoring did not correlate with reduced intraoperative neurological complications in ACDFs (0.09% vs. 0.13%), lumbar fusions (0.32% vs. 0.58%), or lumbar discectomy (1.24% vs. 0.91%). With the addition of neuromonitoring, payments for ACDFs increased 16.24% ($ 3842), lumbar fusions 7.84% ($ 3540), lumbar laminectomies 24.33% ($ 3704), and lumbar discectomies 22.54% ($ 2859). Significiant geographic variation was evident. Some states had no recorded single-level spinal cases with concurrent neuromonitoring. Rates for ACDFs and lumbar fusions, laminectomies, and discectomies ranged as high as 61%, 58%, 22%, and 21%, respectively. Conclusion. With intraoperative neurological monitoring in single-level procedures, neurological complications were decreased only among lumbar laminectomies. No difference was observed in ACDFs, lumbar fusions, or lumbar discectomies. There was a significant increase in total payments associated with the index procedure and hospitalization. We demonstrate significant geographic variation in neuromonitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:1950 / 1959
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Bose Bikash, 2004, Spine J, V4, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.06.001
[2]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619
[3]  
Eggspuehler A, 2007, EUR SPINE J, V16, pS209
[4]   Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data [J].
Elixhauser, A ;
Steiner, C ;
Harris, DR ;
Coffey, RN .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :8-27
[5]   EVALUATION OF INTRAOPERATIVE SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIAL MONITORING DURING 100 CERVICAL OPERATIONS [J].
EPSTEIN, NE ;
DANTO, J ;
NARDI, D .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (06) :737-747
[6]   The Evidence for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery Does It Make a Difference? [J].
Fehlings, Michael G. ;
Brodke, Darrel S. ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Dettori, Joseph R. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (09) :S37-S46
[7]   Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery [J].
Hilibrand, AS ;
Schwartz, DM ;
Sethuraman, V ;
Vaccaro, AR ;
Albert, TJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (06) :1248-1253
[8]   Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients [J].
Kelleher, Michael O. ;
Tan, Gamaliel ;
Sarjeant, Roger ;
Fehlings, Michael G. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 8 (03) :215-221
[9]   Risk factors for false positive transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring alerts during surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy [J].
Kim, David H. ;
Zaremski, Jason ;
Kwon, Brian ;
Jenis, Louis ;
Woodard, Eric ;
Bode, Robert ;
Banco, Robert J. .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (26) :3041-3046
[10]   Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring for intramedullary spinal-cord tumor surgery [J].
Kothbauer, K. F. .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 37 (06) :407-414