ASSESSMENT OF NORMALIZATION TECHNIQUES ON THE ACCURACY OF HYPERSPECTRAL DATA CLUSTERING

被引:8
作者
Naeini, A. Alizadeh [1 ]
Babadi, M. [1 ]
Homayouni, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Isfahan, Dept Geomat Eng, Fac Civil Engn & Transportat, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Geog Environm & Geomat, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCES OF THE 2ND GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION RESEARCH (GI RESEARCH 2017); THE 4TH SENSORS AND MODELS IN PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING (SMPR 2017); THE 6TH EARTH OBSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES (EOEC 2017) | 2017年 / 42-4卷 / W4期
关键词
K-means clustering; normalization techniques; density based initialization; hyperspectral data; FUSION;
D O I
10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-27-2017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Partitioning clustering algorithms, such as k-means, is the most widely used clustering algorithms in the remote sensing community. They are the process of identifying clusters within multidimensional data based on some similarity measures (SM). SMs assign more weights to features with large ranges than those with small ranges. In this way, small-range features are suppressed by large-range features so that they cannot have any effect during clustering procedure. This problem deteriorates for the high-dimensional data such as hyperspectral remotely sensed images. To address this problem, the feature normalization (FN) can be used. However, since different FN methods have different performances, in this study, the effects of ten FN methods on hyperspectral data clustering were studied. The proposed method was implemented on both real and synthetic hyperspectral datasets. The evaluations demonstrated that FN could lead to better results than the case that FN is not performed. More importantly, obtained results showed that the rank-based FN with 15.7% and 12.8% improvement, respectively, in the synthetic and real datasets can be considered as the best FN method for hyperspectral data clustering.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 30
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Feature normalization and likelihood-based similarity measures for image retrieval
    Aksoy, S
    Haralick, RM
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2001, 22 (05) : 563 - 582
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, SOFT COMPUTING KNOWL, DOI DOI 10.1109/CISIM.2008.54
  • [3] Bradley P. S., 1998, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P9
  • [4] A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm
    Celebi, M. Emre
    Kingravi, Hassan A.
    Vela, Patricio A.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (01) : 200 - 210
  • [5] Unsupervised Change Detection in Satellite Images Using Principal Component Analysis and k-Means Clustering
    Celik, Turgay
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2009, 6 (04) : 772 - 776
  • [6] Design-based texture feature fusion using gabor filters and Co-occurrence probabilities
    Clausi, DA
    Deng, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2005, 14 (07) : 925 - 936
  • [7] Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means
    Jain, Anil K.
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2010, 31 (08) : 651 - 666
  • [8] Cluster center initialization algorithm for K-means clustering
    Khan, SS
    Ahmad, A
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2004, 25 (11) : 1293 - 1302
  • [9] Local Binary Patterns and Extreme Learning Machine for Hyperspectral Imagery Classification
    Li, Wei
    Chen, Chen
    Su, Hongjun
    Du, Qian
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 53 (07): : 3681 - 3693
  • [10] MacQueen, 1967, BERK S MATH STAT PRO, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11665-016-2173-6