Sustainability assessment of U.S. final consumption and investments: triple-bottom-line input-output analysis

被引:85
|
作者
Kucukvar, Murat [1 ]
Egilmez, Gokhan [2 ]
Tatari, Omer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, Fargo, ND 58102 USA
关键词
Input-output analysis; Triple bottom line; Final consumption; Sustainability assessment; Cradle to gate life cycle assessment; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; MANUFACTURING SECTORS; ENERGY; CARBON; HOUSEHOLDS; IMPACTS; NATIONS; LAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.033
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The U.S. final demand categories such as household consumption, private fixed investments, government purchases and investments, and export of goods and services have a wide range of environmental, economic, and social impacts. Analysis of these impacts, termed as the Triple Bottom Line (TBL), stimulated a tremendous interest by policy makers over the last decade. Therefore, current research aims to analyze the TBL of U.S. final demands from a systems perspective. To accomplish this goal, the supply and use tables published by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis are merged with a range of environmental, economic, and social metrics. The results show that household consumption has the largest indirect TBL sustainability impacts compared to other final demand categories with shares that range between 43% and 88%. Industrial sectors including manufacturing, utilities, agriculture, construction, transportation, and mining are generally found to be responsible for the highest impacts for most of the environmental impact categories. Service sectors generally have the highest impacts on the economic and social indicators of sustainability. Analysis results also indicate that while meeting the household demand, agriculture, utilities, and manufacturing sectors have relatively more environmental impacts than their contributions to gross domestic product (GDP), whereas service sectors contribute to GDP with a higher share than their environmental burdens. Furthermore, it is envisioned that significant reductions in environmental footprints of U.S. households can be achieved if environmental policies that aim to reduce the household consumption are also supported with sustainable growth through greener and resource efficient economy. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 243
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Integrating triple bottom line input-output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings
    Onat, Nuri Cihat
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Tatari, Omer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (08): : 1488 - 1505
  • [2] Triple-bottom-line assessment of Sao Paulo state's sugarcane production based on a Brazilian multi-regional input-output matrix
    Soto Veiga, Joao Paulo
    Malik, Arunima
    Lenzen, Manfred
    de Souza Ferreira Filho, Joaquim Bento
    Romanelli, Thiago Liborio
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 : 666 - 680
  • [3] Towards a triple bottom-line sustainability assessment of the U.S. construction industry
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Tatari, Omer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (05): : 958 - 972
  • [4] Towards a triple bottom-line sustainability assessment of the U.S. construction industry
    Murat Kucukvar
    Omer Tatari
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 958 - 972
  • [5] Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of U.S. residential buildings
    Ochoa, Luis
    Hendrickson, Chris
    Matthews, H. Scott
    Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2002, 8 (04) : 132 - 138
  • [6] Integrating triple bottom line input–output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings
    Nuri Cihat Onat
    Murat Kucukvar
    Omer Tatari
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1488 - 1505
  • [7] Validating the Sustainability of Eco-Labeled Products Using a Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis
    Ferrero, Vincenzo
    Raman, Arvind Shankar
    Haapala, Karl R.
    DuPont, Bryony
    SMART AND SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2019, 3 (01): : 31 - 52
  • [8] The Sustainability Practitioner's Guide to Input-Output Analysis
    Kagawa, Shigemi
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (02) : 225 - 227
  • [9] The Sustainability Practitioner's Guide to Input-Output Analysis
    O'Reilly, Mary V.
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2014, 22 (02) : 35 - 35
  • [10] Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis
    Wiedmann, T
    Minx, J
    Barrett, J
    Wackernagel, M
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 56 (01) : 28 - 48