Against haute litterature? Andre Gide's Contribution to the World Literature Debate

In 1909 Andre Gide published three short articles in the journal La Nouvelle Revue francaise, subsequently grouped under the title 'Nationalisme et litterature' (Nationalism and literature). They were written as his response to a survey by the young French journalist Henri Clouard, 'Enquete sur la litterature nationale' (Survey on National Literature), in which contemporary writers and critics answered questions regarding possible definitions of French literature. Gide questions the value of the term 'national literature' and objects to the view that haute litterature (good literature) is synonymous with neo-Classical values, arguing instead for a conception of literature that embraces curiosity and innovation. For Gide the term haute litterature is problematic because it implies a hierarchical, regimented and limited view of both literature and culture tout court. The first part of this article argues that Gide's critique of both national literature and haute litterature can be read as a preference for a literariness that is liberated from the constraints of balance and imitation. The second part reads Gide's agronomic metaphor for literary innovation through the lens of Alexander Beecroft's theory of overlapping literary ecologies. Beecroft's model of different ecologies of world literature helps us to locate what I propose to be Gide's own contribution to the world literature debate: an emphasis on literariness that transcends the national-literature ecology and reclaims the notion of haute litterature for a different aesthetic.