Postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: IVPCA with morphine, patient-controlled epidural analgesia, or continuous "3-in-1" block?: A prospective evaluation by our acute pain service in more than 1,300 patients

被引:107
作者
Singelyn, FJ [1 ]
Gouverneur, JMA [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
analgesia; patient-controlled; continuous epidural; arthroplasty; total hip; 3-in-1; block; continuous;
D O I
10.1016/S0952-8180(99)00092-6
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To assess the most appropriate postoperative analgesic technique after hip surgery. Design: Prospective, nonrandomized study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 1,338 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for elective unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). Interventions: During the first 48 postoperative hours, pain relief was provided by intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine (Group I), continuous "3-in-1" block (Group 2), or patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) (Group 3). Measurements and Main Results: During a 7.5-year period, pain scores, supplemental analgesia, satisfaction score, technical problems, and side effects were collected by our acute pain service. Postoperative pain relief was comparable in the three groups. More paracetamol was required in Group 2 (1.0 +/- 1.2 g/48 h) and Group 3 (0.9 +/- 1.3 g/48 h) than in Group 1 (0.5 +/- 1.1 g/48 h) (p < 0.01). However, only 8% of patients in Group 2 and 12% of patients in Group 3 needed an opioid. A higher incidence of technical problems was noted in Group 3 (23.4%) than in Group 1 (2.3%) or Group 2 (5.5%) (p < 0.001). A lower incidence of side effects was observed in Group 2 (23.5%) when compared with Group, 1 (58.8%) and Group 3 (71.9%) (p < 0.001). Satisfaction score was significantly higher in Group 2 than in the other two groups [80 +/- 16 vs. 87 +/- 14 vs. 81 +/- 14 in Groups 1, 5 and 3 respectively (p = 0.003)]. Conclusion: After THA, IV PCA with morphine, continuous "3-in-1" block, and PCEA provided comparable pain relief. Because it induces the fewest technical problems and side effects, continuous "3-in-1" block is the preferred technique. (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 554
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN MAJOR ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY - EPIDURAL AND INTRATHECAL OPIATES
    BARRON, DW
    STRONG, JE
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1981, 36 (10) : 937 - 941
  • [2] Bertini L, 1995, Minerva Anestesiol, V61, P319
  • [3] BICHEL T, 1993, ACTA ANAESTH BELG, V44, P123
  • [4] Bonica J, 1990, MANAGEMENT PAIN, P1557
  • [5] Bonica JJ, 1990, MANAGEMENT PAIN, P461
  • [6] COMPARISON OF THE ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL CLONIDINE AND INTRATHECAL MORPHINE AFTER SPINAL-ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT
    FOGARTY, DJ
    CARABINE, UA
    MILLIGAN, KR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (05) : 661 - 664
  • [7] Postoperative analgesia with "3-in-1" femoral nerve block after prosthetic hip surgery
    Fournier, R
    Van Gessel, E
    Gaggero, G
    Boccovi, S
    Forster, A
    Gamulin, Z
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1998, 45 (01): : 34 - 38
  • [8] FRERK CM, 1988, ANAESTHESIA, V43, P167
  • [9] PATTERNS OF POST-OPERATIVE PAIN - STUDY OF THE USE OF CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN THE POST-OPERATIVE PERIOD
    GJESSING, J
    TOMLIN, PJ
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1979, 34 (07) : 624 - 632
  • [10] Spinal and epidural blockade and perioperative low molecular weight heparin:: Smooth sailing on the Titanic
    Horlocker, TT
    Wedel, DJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (06) : 1153 - 1156