Comparison of different adhesively-bonded joint configurations for mechanical structures

被引:4
作者
Barbosa, N. G. C. [1 ]
Campilho, R. D. S. G. [1 ,2 ]
da Silva, F. J. G. [1 ]
Moreira, R. D. F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Politecn Porto, Inst Super Engn Porto, Dept Engn Mecan, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino de Almeida 431, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[2] INEGI, Polo FEUP, Rua Dr Roberto Frias S-N, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
来源
28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING (FAIM2018): GLOBAL INTEGRATION OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING AND SMART INDUSTRY FOR GOOD OF HUMANITY | 2018年 / 17卷
关键词
Epoxy; Polyurethane; Finite Element Analysis; Fracture Mechanics; Cohesive Zone Models; STRENGTH IMPROVEMENT; STRESS-ANALYSIS; SCARF JOINT; LAP JOINTS; SINGLE; FRACTURE; GEOMETRY; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.122
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Adhesively-bonded joints are widely used to join structural components. The most common joint configurations are single-lap joints (SLJ), double-lap joints (DLJ), stepped joints and scarf joints. One of the most important parameters that affects the joint strength is the overlap length (Lo). The main objectives of this work are to carry out a comparative study involving several joint geometries using various adhesives with different characteristics and to check which type of adhesive is most suitable for a particular joint geometry. For this purpose, SLJ, DLJ, stepped joints and scarf joints were chosen for testing with three adhesives. The experimental results are compared with numerical results obtained using Abaqus software using an integrated cohesive zone modelling (CZM) module. With this work, it was concluded that the optimal joint configuration depends significantly on the type of adhesive being used, such that less resistant and ductile adhesives are more suitable for joint geometries that exhibit large stress variations, while stronger but more brittle adhesives are recommended for joint geometries with more uniform stresses. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 728
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ASTME8M04
[3]   Lapped scarf joint with inclined faces and wooden dowels: Experimental and numerical analysis [J].
Arciszewska-Kedzior, Anna ;
Kunecky, Jiri ;
Hasnikova, Hana ;
Sebera, Vaclav .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 94 :1-8
[4]   Stress and failure analyses of scarf repaired CFRP laminates using a cohesive damage model [J].
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
De Moura, M. F. S. F. ;
Domingues, J. J. M. S. .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (09) :855-870
[5]   Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer [J].
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
Banea, M. D. ;
Neto, J. A. B. P. ;
da Silva, L. F. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2013, 44 :48-56
[6]   Fracture toughness determination of adhesive and co-cured joints in natural fibre composites [J].
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
Moura, D. C. ;
Goncalves, D. J. S. ;
da Silva, J. F. M. G. ;
Banea, M. D. ;
da Silva, L. F. M. .
COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2013, 50 :120-126
[7]   Modelling of Single-Lap Joints Using Cohesive Zone Models: Effect of the Cohesive Parameters on the Output of the Simulations [J].
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
Banea, M. D. ;
Neto, J. A. B. P. ;
da Silva, L. F. M. .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2012, 88 (4-6) :513-533
[8]   Strength Improvement of Adhesively-Bonded Joints Using a Reverse-Bent Geometry [J].
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
Pinto, A. M. G. ;
Banea, M. D. ;
Silva, R. F. ;
da Silva, L. F. M. .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 25 (18) :2351-2368
[9]   Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling [J].
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
Banea, M. D. ;
Pinto, A. M. G. ;
da Silva, L. F. M. ;
de Jesus, A. M. P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2011, 31 (05) :363-372
[10]   Techniques to reduce the peel stresses in adhesive joints with composites [J].
da Silva, Lucas F. M. ;
D Adams, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2007, 27 (03) :227-235