Multi-sectoral health promotion and public health: the role of evidence

被引:42
作者
Armstrong, Rebecca
Doyle, Jodie
Lamb, Chris
Waters, Elizabeth
机构
[1] Cochrane Hlth Promot & Publ Hlth Field, VicHlth, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Melbourne, Vic 3125, Australia
关键词
evidence; health promotion; multi-sectoral; public health; systematic review;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdl013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Evidence-informed health promotion and public health is an emerging and ever-changing theme in research and practice. A collaborative approach to gathering and applying evidence is crucial to implementing effective multi-sectoral health promotion and public health interventions for improved population outcomes. This paper presents an argument for the development of multi-sector evidence and discusses both facilitators and challenges to this process. Methods: Sector-specific contacts familiar with decision-making processes were selected from referrals gained through academic, government and non-government networks and interviewed (in-person or via telephone) as part of a small scale study to scope the use of evidence within non-health sectors where decisions are likely to impact on public health. Results: The views gathered are preliminary, and this analysis would benefit from more extensive consultation. Nonetheless, information gathered from the interviews and literature search provide valuable insights into evidence-related decision-making paradigms which demonstrate similarities with, and differences from, those found in the health sector. Conclusions: Decisions in health promotion and public may benefit from consideration of the ways in which disciplines and sectors can work together to inform policy and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 172
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Research Impact: a cross sector review of literature and practice
[2]  
[Anonymous], J HLTH SERV RES POLI
[3]  
[Anonymous], GUIDELINES SYSTEMATI
[4]  
Bowen Sarah, 2005, J Health Serv Res Policy, V10, P203, DOI 10.1258/135581905774414213
[5]  
Chalmers I., 2005, Evidence & Policy, V1, P227, DOI [10.1332/1744264053730806, DOI 10.1332/1744264053730806]
[6]  
DAVIES P, 2006, WORKFORCE DEV SUPPOR
[7]   Utility-driven evidence for healthy cities: Problems with evidence generation and application [J].
de Leeuw, E ;
Skovgaard, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (06) :1331-1341
[8]   New roads and human health: A systematic review [J].
Egan, M ;
Petticrew, M ;
Ogilvie, D ;
Hamilton, V .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (09) :1463-1471
[9]   Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial [J].
Hawe, P ;
Shiell, A ;
Riley, T ;
Gold, L .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2004, 58 (09) :788-793
[10]  
Jacobson Nora, 2003, J Health Serv Res Policy, V8, P94, DOI 10.1258/135581903321466067