A study of the flexural strength and surface hardness of different materials and technologies for occlusal device fabrication

被引:42
|
作者
Prpic, Vladimir [1 ]
Slacanin, Ivan [2 ]
Schauperl, Zdravko [3 ]
Catic, Amir [4 ]
Dulcic, Niksa [4 ]
Cimic, Samir [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Sch Dent Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Fac Mech Engn & Naval Architecture, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Zagreb, Fac Mech Engn & Naval Architecture, Dept Mat, Zagreb, Croatia
[4] Univ Zagreb, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, Gundulkeva 5, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
关键词
VITRO WEAR-RESISTANCE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; SLEEP BRUXISM; DENTURE; POLYAMIDE; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.022
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. With the emergence of digital technologies, new materials have become available for occlusal devices. However, data are scarce about these different materials and technologies and their mechanical properties. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the flexural strength and surface hardness of different materials using different technologies for occlusal device fabrication, with an emphasis on the digital technologies of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) and 3D printing. Material and methods. A total of 140 rectangular specimens were fabricated from two 3D-printed (VarseoWax Splint and Ortho Rigid), 2 CAD-CAM-produced (Ceramill Splintec and CopraDur), and 3 conventional autopolymerizing occlusal device materials (ProBase Cold, Resilit S, and Orthocryl) according to ISO 20795-1:2013. Flexural strength and surface hardness were determined for 10 specimens of each tested material using the 3-point bend test and the Brinell method. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections (alpha=.05). Results. Surface hardness values ranged from 28.5 +/- 2.5 MPa to 116.2 +/- 1.6 MPa. During flexural testing, neither the CopraDur nor the VarseoWax Splint specimens fractured during loading within the end limits of the penetrant's possible movement. Flexural strength values for other groups ranged from 75.0 +/- 12.0 MPa to 104.9 +/- 6.2 MPa. Statistical analysis determined significant differences among the tested materials for flexural strength and surface hardness. Conclusions. Mechanical properties among different occlusal device materials were significantly different. Acrylic resins were less flexible than polyamide and nonacrylic occlusal device materials for 3D printing but had higher and more consistent values of surface hardness. Clinicians should consider the different mechanical properties of the available materials when choosing occlusal device materials.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 959
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating the Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Vickers Hardness and Flexural Strength of Zirconium and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics
    Ozdogan, Alper
    Duymus, Zeynep Yesil
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (02): : 129 - 135
  • [2] Two-body wear and surface hardness of occlusal splint materials
    Gibreel, Mona
    Perea-Lowery, Leila
    Vallittu, Pekka K.
    Garoushi, Sufyan
    Lassila, Lippo
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2022, 41 (06) : 916 - 922
  • [3] Experimental Study on Microstructural, Surface Hardness and Flexural Strength of Injection Molded Microcellular Foamed Parts
    Rezavand, Seyed Abdol Mohammad
    Behravesh, Amir Hossein
    Mahmoodi, Mehdi
    Shahi, Peyman
    CELLULAR POLYMERS, 2009, 28 (06) : 405 - 428
  • [4] Surface hardness and flexural strength of dual-cured bulk-fill restorative materials after solvent storage
    Alzahrani, Bashayer
    Alshabib, Abdulrahman
    Awliya, Wedad
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [5] Influence of Surface Treatment and Accelerated Ageing on Biaxial Flexural Strength and Hardness of Zirconia
    Rohr, Nadja
    Schonenberger, Angela Jacqueline
    Fischer, Jens
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [6] Effects of thermal cycling on surface roughness, hardness and flexural strength of polymethylmethacrylate and polyamide denture base resins
    Ayaz, Elif Aydogan
    Bagis, Bora
    Turgut, Sedanur
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMATERIALS & FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2015, 13 (03): : E280 - E286
  • [7] BIAXIAL FLEXURAL STRENGTH AND HARDNESS OF RESIN-MATRIX CERAMIC CAD/CAM MATERIALS
    Alnafaiy, Sarah M.
    Labban, Nawaf
    Maawadh, Ahmed
    Al Shehri, Huda A.
    Aljamhan, Abdullah S.
    Al Ghamdi, Wejdan
    CERAMICS-SILIKATY, 2021, 65 (03) : 285 - 294
  • [8] Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Different Denture Base Materials Reinforced with Different Nanoparticles
    Karci, Muhammet
    Demir, Necla
    Yazman, Sakir
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (05): : 572 - 579
  • [9] Correlation of flexural strength of coupons versus strength of crowns fabricated with different zirconia materials with and without aging
    Alghazzawi, Tariq F.
    Janowski, Gregg M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 146 (12) : 904 - +
  • [10] Biaxial flexural strength of different provisional restorative materials under chemo-mechanical aging: An in vitro study
    Sadek, Hoda M. Abdel
    El-Banna, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 33 (02): : 149 - 156