Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer

被引:23
作者
Cheddad, Abbas [1 ]
Czene, Kamila [1 ]
Eriksson, Mikael [1 ]
Li, Jingmei [2 ]
Easton, Douglas [3 ]
Hall, Per [1 ]
Humphreys, Keith [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Genome Inst Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Canc Genet Epidemiol, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
TOOL; FORM;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0110690
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction: Mammographic density, the white radiolucent part of a mammogram, is a marker of breast cancer risk and mammographic sensitivity. There are several means of measuring mammographic density, among which are area-based and volumetric-based approaches. Current volumetric methods use only unprocessed, raw mammograms, which is a problematic restriction since such raw mammograms are normally not stored. We describe fully automated methods for measuring both area and volumetric mammographic density from processed images. Methods: The data set used in this study comprises raw and processed images of the same view from 1462 women. We developed two algorithms for processed images, an automated area-based approach (CASAM-Area) and a volumetric-based approach (CASAM-Vol). The latter method was based on training a random forest prediction model with image statistical features as predictors, against a volumetric measure, Volpara, for corresponding raw images. We contrast the three methods, CASAM-Area, CASAM-Vol and Volpara directly and in terms of association with breast cancer risk and a known genetic variant for mammographic density and breast cancer, rs10995190 in the gene ZNF365. Associations with breast cancer risk were evaluated using images from 47 breast cancer cases and 1011 control subjects. The genetic association analysis was based on 1011 control subjects. Results: All three measures of mammographic density were associated with breast cancer risk and rs10995190 (p<0.025 for breast cancer risk and p, 1610 26 for rs10995190). After adjusting for one of the measures there remained little or no evidence of residual association with the remaining density measures (p>0.10 for risk, p>0.03 for rs10995190). Conclusions: Our results show that it is possible to obtain reliable automated measures of volumetric and area mammographic density from processed digital images. Area and volumetric measures of density on processed digital images performed similar in terms of risk and genetic association.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Screen-Film Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: A Comparison of the Volumetric Standard Mammogram Form and the Interactive Threshold Measurement Methods [J].
Aitken, Zoe ;
McCormack, Valerie A. ;
Highnam, Ralph P. ;
Martin, Lisa ;
Gunasekara, Anoma ;
Melnichouk, Olga ;
Mawdsley, Gord ;
Peressotti, Chris ;
Yaffe, Martin ;
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Silva, Isabel dos Santos .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (02) :418-428
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Feature extraction image processing for computer vision, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-396549-3.00007-0
[3]   Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: Evaluation of a Novel Method of Measuring Breast Tissue Volumes [J].
Boyd, Norman ;
Martin, Lisa ;
Gunasekar, Anoma ;
Melnichouk, Olga ;
Maudsley, Gord ;
Peressotti, Chris ;
Yaffe, Martin ;
Minkin, Salomon .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (06) :1754-1762
[4]   Mammographic density [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Yaffe, Martin ;
Minkin, Salomon .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 11
[5]   Automated Measurement of Volumetric Mammographic Density: A Tool for Widespread Breast Cancer Risk Assessment [J].
Brand, Judith S. ;
Czene, Kamila ;
Shepherd, John A. ;
Leifland, Karin ;
Heddson, Boel ;
Sundbom, Ann ;
Eriksson, Mikael ;
Li, Jingmei ;
Humphreys, Keith ;
Hall, Per .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2014, 23 (09) :1764-1772
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[9]   Enhancement of Mammographic Density Measures in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction [J].
Cheddad, Abbas ;
Czene, Kamila ;
Shepherd, John A. ;
Li, Jingmei ;
Hall, Per ;
Humphreys, Keith .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2014, 23 (07) :1314-1323
[10]   A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification [J].
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Calabrese, Massimo ;
Durando, Manuela ;
Gentilini, Maria Adalgisa ;
Mariscotti, Giovanna ;
Monetti, Francesco ;
Moriconi, Enrica ;
Pesce, Barbara ;
Roselli, Antonella ;
Stevanin, Carmen ;
Tapparelli, Margherita ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
BREAST, 2012, 21 (04) :503-506