Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation

被引:110
作者
Rippon, Gina [1 ]
Jordan-Young, Rebecca [2 ]
Kaiser, Anelis [3 ]
Fine, Cordelia [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Aston Brain Ctr, Sch Life & Hlth Sci Psychol, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[2] Columbia Univ, Barnard Coll, Dept Womens Gender & Sexual Studies, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Bern, Inst Psychol, Dept Social Psychol, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Businesd Sch, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Eth Leadership, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
brain imaging; sex differences; sex similarities; gender; stereotypes; essentialism; plasticity; SEX-DIFFERENCES; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SEDUCTIVE ALLURE; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; BRAIN STRUCTURE; SIZE; METAANALYSIS; NEUROSCIENCE; PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2014.00650
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Neuroimaging (NI) technologies are having increasing impact in the study of complex cognitive and social processes. In this emerging field of social cognitive neuroscience, a central goal should be to increase the understanding of the interaction between the neurobiology of the individual and the environment in which humans develop and function. The study of sex/gender is often a focus for NI research, and may be motivated by a desire to better understand general developmental principles, mental health problems that show female male disparities, and gendered differences in society. In order to ensure the maximum possible contribution of NI research to these goals, we draw attention to four key principles overlap, mosaicism, contingency and entanglement that have emerged from sex/gender research and that should inform NI research design, analysis and interpretation. We discuss the implications of these principles in the form of constructive guidelines and suggestions for researchers, editors, reviewers and science communicators.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 153 条
[51]   Age Group and Sex Differences in Performance on a Computerized Neurocognitive Battery in Children Age 8-21 [J].
Gur, Ruben C. ;
Richard, Jan ;
Calkins, Monica E. ;
Chiavacci, Rosetta ;
Hansen, John A. ;
Bilker, Warren B. ;
Loughead, James ;
Connolly, John J. ;
Qiu, Haijun ;
Mentch, Frank D. ;
Abou-Sleiman, Patrick M. ;
Hakonarson, Hakon ;
Gur, Raquel E. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) :251-265
[52]  
Hacking I, 1995, SYMP SYSSEN FDN, P351
[53]   Socioeconomic status and the developing brain [J].
Hackman, Daniel A. ;
Farah, Martha J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (02) :65-73
[54]   MRI assessment of cortical thickness and functional activity changes in adolescent girls following three months of practice on a visual-spatial task [J].
Haier R.J. ;
Karama S. ;
Leyba L. ;
Jung R.E. .
BMC Research Notes, 2 (1)
[55]   Essentialist beliefs about social categories [J].
Haslam, N ;
Rothschild, L ;
Ernst, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 39 :113-127
[56]   Human Natures: Psychological Essentialism in Thinking about Differences between People [J].
Haslam, Nick ;
Whelan, Jennifer .
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2008, 2 (03) :1297-1312
[57]   Interactive effects of sex hormones and gender stereotypes on cognitive sex differences-A psychobiosocial approach [J].
Hausmann, Markus ;
Schoofs, Daniela ;
Rosenthal, Harriet E. S. ;
Jordan, Kirsten .
PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2009, 34 (03) :389-401
[58]  
Hoffman G, 2012, NEW DIR PHILOS COGN, P30
[59]   Gender Similarities and Differences [J].
Hyde, Janet Shibley .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 65, 2014, 65 :373-398
[60]   The gender similarities hypothesis [J].
Hyde, JS .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 60 (06) :581-592