Computational Modeling of Embodied Visual Perspective Taking

被引:6
作者
Fischer, Tobias [1 ]
Demiris, Yiannis [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Personal Robot Lab, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, London SW7 2BT, England
关键词
Computational modeling; Time factors; Robots; Visualization; Predictive models; Task analysis; Torso; forward models; perspective taking; social psychology; visual perception; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; IMITATION; SELF; COGNITION; INFANTS; SKILLS; RHYTHM; MINDS; THETA; TMS;
D O I
10.1109/TCDS.2019.2949861
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Humans are inherently social beings that benefit from their perceptional capability to embody another point of view, typically referred to as perspective taking. Perspective taking is an essential feature in our daily interactions and is pivotal for human development. However, much remains unknown about the precise mechanisms that underlie perspective taking. Here, we show that formalizing perspective taking in a computational model can detail the embodied mechanisms employed by humans in perspective taking. The model's main building block is a set of action primitives that are passed through a forward model. The model employs a process that selects a subset of action primitives to be passed through the forward model to reduce the response time. The model demonstrates the results that mimic those captured by human data, including response times differences caused by the angular disparity between the perspective-taker and the other agent, the impact of task-irrelevant body posture variations in perspective taking, and differences in the perspective taking strategy between individuals. Our results provide support for the hypothesis that perspective taking is a mental simulation of the physical movements that are required to match another person's visual viewpoint. Furthermore, the model provides several testable predictions, including the prediction that forced early responses lead to an egocentric bias and that a selection process introduces dependencies between two consecutive trials. Our results indicate potential links between perspective taking and other essential perceptional and cognitive mechanisms, such as active vision and autobiographical memories.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 732
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Dissociating contributions of head and torso to spatial reference frames: The misalignment paradigm [J].
Alsmith, Adrian J. T. ;
Ferre, Elisa R. ;
Longo, Matthew R. .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2017, 53 :105-114
[2]   Taking someone else's spatial perspective: Natural stance or effortful decentring? [J].
Arnold, Gabriel ;
Spence, Charles ;
Auvray, Malika .
COGNITION, 2016, 148 :27-33
[3]   Revisiting active perception [J].
Bajesy, Ruzena ;
Aloimonos, Yiannis ;
Tsotsos, John K. .
AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, 2018, 42 (02) :177-196
[4]   From the perception of action to the understanding of intention [J].
Blakemore, SJ ;
Decety, J .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 2 (08) :561-567
[5]   Spatiotemporal Judgments of Observed Actions: Contrasts Between First- and Third-Person Perspectives After Motor Priming [J].
Brattan, Victoria C. ;
Baker, Daniel H. ;
Tipper, Steven P. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2015, 41 (05) :1236-1246
[6]   Using perspective taking to learn from ambiguous demonstrations [J].
Breazeal, Cynthia ;
Berlin, Matt ;
Brooks, Andrew ;
Gray, Jesse ;
Thomaz, Andrea L. .
ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2006, 54 (05) :385-393
[7]   Visual imagery in autobiographical memory: The role of repeated retrieval in shifting perspective [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Rice, Heather J. ;
Wooldridge, Cynthia L. ;
Rubin, David C. .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 :237-253
[8]  
Demiris J, 2002, FROM ANIM ANIMAT, P327
[9]   The robot in the crib: A developmental analysis of imitation skills in infants and robots [J].
Demiris, Yiannis ;
Meltzoff, Andrew .
INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 17 (01) :43-53
[10]   Toward Integrative Dynamic Models for Adaptive Perspective Taking [J].
Duran, Nicholas ;
Dale, Rick ;
Galati, Alexia .
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2016, 8 (04) :761-779