Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative-robust solutions

被引:10
作者
Cacador, Sandra [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dias, Joana Matos [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Godinho, Pedro [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, R Assoc Humanitaria Bombeiros Voluntarios Aveiro, Higher Inst Accountancy & Adm, P-3810500 Portugal, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, Ctr Business & Econ Res CeBER, Av Dias da Silva 165, P-3004512 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, Av Dias da Silva 165, P-3004512 Coimbra, Portugal
[4] Inst Syst Engn & Comp Coimbra, Rua Antero de Quental 199, P-3000033 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
robust optimization; portfolio selection; relative robustness; minimax regret; OPTIMIZATION; CONSTRAINTS; DIVERSIFICATION; COVARIANCES; SENSITIVITY; SKEWNESS; RETURNS;
D O I
10.1111/itor.12674
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper, a new methodology for computing relative-robust portfolios based on minimax regret is proposed. Regret is defined as the utility loss for the investor resulting from choosing a given portfolio instead of choosing the optimal portfolio of the realized scenario. The absolute-robust strategy was also considered and, in this case, the minimum investor's expected utility in the worst-case scenario is maximized. Several subsamples are gathered from the in-sample data and for each subsample a minimax regret and a maximin solution are computed, to avoid the risk of overfitting. Robust portfolios are computed using a genetic algorithm, allowing the transformation of a three-level optimization problem in a two-level problem. Results show that the proposed relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms (other) relative-robust and non-robust portfolios, except for the global minimum variance portfolio. Furthermore, the relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms the absolute-robust portfolio, even considering higher risk aversion levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1329
页数:34
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Robust Portfolio Optimization and Management
[2]   Coherent measures of risk [J].
Artzner, P ;
Delbaen, F ;
Eber, JM ;
Heath, D .
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) :203-228
[3]   Robust convex optimization [J].
Ben-Tal, A ;
Nemirovski, A .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1998, 23 (04) :769-805
[4]   A Soft Robust Model for Optimization Under Ambiguity [J].
Ben-Tal, Aharon ;
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Brown, David B. .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (04) :1220-1234
[5]  
BenTal A, 2009, PRINC SER APPL MATH, P1
[6]   EXPOSITION OF A NEW THEORY ON THE MEASUREMENT OF RISK [J].
Bernoulli, Daniel .
ECONOMETRICA, 1954, 22 (01) :23-36
[7]  
Bertsimas D., 2006, Robust and Data-Driven Optimization: Modern Decision Making Under Uncertainty, P95
[8]   ON THE SENSITIVITY OF MEAN-VARIANCE-EFFICIENT PORTFOLIOS TO CHANGES IN ASSET MEANS - SOME ANALYTICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS [J].
BEST, MJ ;
GRAUER, RR .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1991, 4 (02) :315-342
[9]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR MEAN-VARIANCE PORTFOLIO PROBLEMS [J].
BEST, MJ ;
GRAUER, RR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1991, 37 (08) :980-989
[10]   The robust Merton problem of an ambiguity averse investor [J].
Biagini, Sara ;
Pinar, Mustafa C. .
MATHEMATICS AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 11 (01) :1-24