Interaction between caspofungin or voriconazole and cefoperazone-sulbactam or piperacillin-tazobactam by in vitro and in vivo methods

被引:8
|
作者
Keceli, Sema Askin [1 ]
Willke, Ayse [2 ]
Tamer, Gulden Sonmez [1 ]
Boral, Ozden Buyukbaba [3 ]
Sonmez, Nese [3 ]
Cagatay, Penbe [3 ]
机构
[1] Kocaeli Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Microbiol, TR-41380 Kocaeli, Turkey
[2] Kocaeli Univ, Fac Med, Dept Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, TR-41380 Kocaeli, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Caspofungin; voriconazole; cefoperazone-sulbactam; piperacillin-tazobactam; synergy; RESISTANT CANDIDA-ALBICANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; FLUCONAZOLE; COMBINATION; CYCLOSPORINE; ASPERGILLUS; EFFICACY; SYNERGY;
D O I
10.1111/apm.12159
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Immunosuppressive patients are at risk of fungal and bacterial infections. Therefore, these patients receive prophylactic, preemptive, empirical or target antifungal and concomitant antibiotic therapy. To this end, caspofungin (CAS) or voriconazole (VRC) antifungals and cefoperazone-sulbactam (CPZ/SAM) or piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) antibiotics may be used. Here, we aimed to investigate the interaction between these antifungals and antibiotics by in vitro and in vivo methods. The interaction was tested by chequerboard analysis and fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). It was also tested in a neutropenic mice-invasive candidiasis model and evaluated by fungal burden in kidney tissue of infected animals from the first day to the fifth day of treatment with 24h intervals. A synergism was detected between CAS and CPZ/SAM (FICI=0.1) and PIP/TAZ (FICI=0.3). Fungal burden in tissues of drug-treated mice was reduced compared with controls in a time-dependent manner. In comparison with CAS-alone treated group, there were 1.32log(10) reductions of fungal burden in CAS+CPZ/SAM (p=0.002) and in CAS+PIP/TAZ group (p=0.14). The same interactions were not found with VRC and antibiotics. CPZ/SAM had stronger synergistic interaction with CAS than PIP/TAZ. The mechanism of synergism is not well understood. This is most likely due to an increase in the anticandidal effect of CAS plus antibiotics.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 417
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Clinical effectiveness of cefoperazone-sulbactam vs. piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of pneumonia in elderly patients
    Huang, Chun-Ta
    Chen, Chia-Hung
    Chen, Wei-Chih
    Wang, Yao-Tung
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Fu, Pin-Kuei
    Kuo, Li-Kuo
    Chen, Chin-Ming
    Fang, Wen-Feng
    Tu, Chih-Yen
    Ku, Shih-Chi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2022, 59 (01)
  • [2] A comparison of the efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam therapies in the empirical treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia
    Aynioglu, Aynur
    Mutlu, Birsen
    Hacihanefioglu, Abdullah
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA, 2016, 29 (02) : 69 - 75
  • [3] Clinical Efficacy of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
    Chen, Chia-Hung
    Tu, Chih-Yen
    Chen, Wei-Chih
    Kuo, Li-Kuo
    Wang, Yao-Tung
    Fu, Pin-Kuei
    Ku, Shih-Chi
    Fang, Wen-Feng
    Chen, Chin-Ming
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2021, 14 : 2251 - 2258
  • [4] Randomized Comparison of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Plus Amikacin Versus Cefoperazone-Sulbactam Plus Amikacin for Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Children with Lymphoma and Solid Tumors
    Demirkaya, Metin
    Celebi, Solmaz
    Sevinir, Betul
    Hacimustafaoglu, Mustafa
    PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 30 (02) : 141 - 148
  • [5] In vitro activity and clinical efficacy of macrolides, cefoperazone-sulbactam and piperacillin/piperacillin-tazobactam against Bordetella pertussis and the clinical manifestations in pertussis patients due to these isolates: A single-centre study in Zhejiang Province, China
    Hua, Chun-Zhen
    Wang, Hong-Jiao
    Zhang, Zhe
    Tao, Xiao-Fen
    Li, Jian-Ping
    Mi, Yu-Mei
    Tang, Lan-Fang
    Chen, Zhi-Min
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2019, 18 : 47 - 51
  • [6] In vitro interaction between mecillinam and piperacillin-tazobactam in the presence of azithromycin against members of the Enterobacteriaceae family and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Maioli, Elisabetta
    Debbia, Eugenio A.
    Gualco, Laura
    Marchese, Anna
    NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2008, 31 (01): : 37 - 46
  • [7] In Vitro-In Vivo Discordance with Humanized Piperacillin-Tazobactam Exposures against Piperacillin-Tazobactam- Resistant/Pan-β-Lactam-Susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains
    Stainton, S. M.
    Monogue, M. L.
    Nicolau, D. P.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 61 (07)
  • [8] In vitro and in vivo activities of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem at different inoculum sizes of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
    Harada, Y.
    Morinaga, Y.
    Kaku, N.
    Nakamura, S.
    Uno, N.
    Hasegawa, H.
    Izumikawa, K.
    Kohno, S.
    Yanagihara, K.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2014, 20 (11) : O831 - O839
  • [9] Combination Therapy in Treatment of Experimental Pulmonary Aspergillosis: In Vitro and In Vivo Correlations of the Concentration- and Dose-Dependent Interactions between Anidulafungin and Voriconazole by Bliss Independence Drug Interaction Analysis
    Petraitis, Vidmantas
    Petraitiene, Ruta
    Hope, William W.
    Meletiadis, Joseph
    Mickiene, Diana
    Hughes, Johanna E.
    Cotton, Margaret P.
    Stergiopoulou, Theodouli
    Kasai, Miki
    Francesconi, Andrea
    Schaufele, Robert L.
    Sein, Tin
    Avila, Nilo A.
    Bacher, John
    Walsh, Thomas J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 53 (06) : 2382 - 2391