Local anesthesia using buffered 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for tumors of the digits treated with Mohs micrographic surgery

被引:22
作者
Firoz, Bahar [1 ,2 ]
Davis, Nathan [2 ]
Goldberg, Leonard H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] DermSurg Associates, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Methodist Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Dermatol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Med, Houston, TX USA
关键词
digits; epinephrine; fingers; lidocaine; local anesthesia; Mohs micrographic surgery; toes; THICKNESS SKIN-GRAFTS; BLOCKS; ADRENALINE; FINGER; HAND; MYTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2009.07.005
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Several specialties and textbooks continue to advocate that local anesthesia using epinephrine Should not be used during surgery involving the digits. Objective: We sought to assess the association between local anesthesia (buffered 0.5% lidocaine and 1:200,000 epinephrine) injected into digits, comorbid patient conditions, and postoperative complications including ischemia or necrosis. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients presenting for Mohs micrographic surgery in a private practice ambulatory surgery center was performed between October 2002 and January 2009. Patient factors including amount of anesthesia injected; preoperative vitals; history of hypertension, stroke, or circulatory disorders; and presence of anticoagulation were assessed. Results: Three Molls Surgeons' patients were included in the study. No digital blocks were performed; local anesthesia was infiltrated directly into the tumor site. Patients received buffered 0.5% lidocaine plus epinephrine 1:200,000. Of 63 patients presenting for Surgery (59 fingers and 4 toes), there were no cases of digital ischemia or necrosis. Approximately one-third had a circulatory disorder or diabetes, and more than half had a diagnosis of hypertension or were taking anticoagulation. The average amount of anesthesia injected was 6.92 mL, with the greatest amount being 25 mL. Limitations: This was a retrospective review with possible overestimation of adverse effects as a result of referral bias of complicated patients to an ambulatory surgery center for treatment. Conclusion: There is no evidence that buffered 0.5% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 causes ischemia or necrosis when injected into digits. This is true despite a history of circulatory disorders, thrombosis, diabetes, smoking, anticoagulation, or significant preoperative hypertension. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:639-43.)
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 643
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Epinephrine in digital block:: Color Doppler flow imaging [J].
Altinyazar, HC ;
Özdemir, H ;
Koca, R ;
Hosnuter, M ;
Demirel, CB ;
Gündogdu, S .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2004, 30 (04) :508-511
[2]   Digital blocks with or without epinephrine [J].
Andrades, PR ;
Olguin, FA ;
Calderón, W .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (05) :1769-1770
[3]   Dermal tumescent local anesthesia in cutaneous surgery [J].
Behroozan, DS ;
Goldberg, LH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2005, 53 (05) :828-830
[4]   A comprehensive review of epinephrine in the finger: To do or not to do [J].
Denkler, K .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (01) :114-124
[5]   FULL-THICKNESS SKIN-GRAFTS - CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE IMPACT OF USING EPINEPHRINE IN LOCAL-ANESTHESIA OF THE DONOR SITE [J].
FAZIO, MJ ;
ZITELLI, JA .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 131 (06) :691-694
[6]   THE USE OF FULL-THICKNESS SKIN-GRAFTS FOR THE REPAIR OF DEFECTS ON THE DORSAL HAND AND DIGITS [J].
GLOSTER, HM ;
DAOUD, MS ;
ROENIGK, RK .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1995, 21 (11) :953-959
[7]   TUMESCENT TECHNIQUE FOR REGIONAL ANESTHESIA PERMITS LIDOCAINE DOSES OF 35 MG/KG FOR LIPOSUCTION [J].
KLEIN, JA .
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1990, 16 (03) :248-263
[8]  
Kollersbeck C, 2004, Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir, V36, P64
[9]   Digital anesthesia with epinephrine: An old myth revisited [J].
Krunic, AL ;
Wang, LC ;
Soltani, K ;
Weitzul, S ;
Taylor, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 51 (05) :755-759
[10]  
Lalonde D, 2005, J HAND SURG-AM, V30A, P1061, DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.05.006