共 50 条
Measuring obsessive-compulsive symptoms: Padua Inventory-Revised vs. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale
被引:34
|作者:
Anholt, Gideon E.
[1
,2
,3
]
van Oppen, Patricia
[1
,2
,3
]
Emmelkamp, Paul M. G.
[4
]
Cath, Danielle C.
[1
,2
,3
]
Smit, Johannes H.
[1
,2
,3
]
van Dyck, Richard
[1
,2
,3
]
van Balkom, Anton J. L. M.
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] GGZ InGeest, Dept Psychiat, NL-1081 HL Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] GGZ InGeest, EMGO Inst, Univ Med Ctr, NL-1081 HL Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] GGZ InGeest, Acad Outpatient Clin Anxiety Disorders, NL-1081 HL Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词:
Obsessive-compulsive disorder;
Assessment;
Scales;
SELF-REPORT;
DISORDER;
VALIDITY;
PERSONALITY;
RELIABILITY;
SENSITIVITY;
DIMENSIONS;
INTERVIEW;
D O I:
10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.04.004
中图分类号:
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号:
040203 ;
摘要:
Although the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Padua Inventory-Revised (PI-R) are the most widely used instruments for assessing presence and severity of symptoms in obsessive-compulsive disorder (CCD), the correlation between the two instruments is surprisingly low. The aim of the present investigation was to test two possible explanations for the discrepancy between these instruments by comparing both scales in 120 OCD patients. The tested hypotheses included: (1) differences in the way the measures are administered, i.e. observer-rated vs. self-rated; and (2) differences in the way severity is calculated, i.e. the PI-R measures severity by aggregating symptoms, while the Y-BOCS measures severity unrelated to the number of symptoms. Results indicated that neither hypothesis satisfactorily explains the differences between the measures. The investigation concludes that the Y-BOCS and PI-R measure relatively unrelated features of OCD, and the combined use of multiple measures is recommended to assess the complexity of OCD phenomena. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 835
页数:6
相关论文