What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties?

被引:17
作者
Pronk, Yvette [1 ]
van der Weegen, Walter [2 ]
Vos, Rein [3 ]
Brinkman, Justus-Martijn [4 ]
van Heerwaarden, Ronald Johannes [4 ]
Pilot, Peter [5 ]
机构
[1] Kliniek ViaSana, Res Dept, Hoogveldseweg 1, NL-5451 AA Mill, Netherlands
[2] Sint Anna Ziekenhuis, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Bogardeind 2, NL-5664 EH Geldrop, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, P Debyepl 1, NL-6229 HA Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Kliniek ViaSana, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hoogveldseweg 1, NL-5451 AA Mill, Netherlands
[5] Stichting IMA, Kanaaldijk 10, NL-6116 AD Roosteren, Netherlands
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Response rate; Total hip arthroplasty; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FOLLOW-UP; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; REGISTRIES; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-020-01628-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Unknown is which response rate on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is needed to both obtain an accurate outcome and ensure generalizability in evaluating total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures. Without an evidence based minimum response rate (MRR) on THA PROMs, it is possible that hospitals report invalid patient-reported outcomes (PROs) due to a too low response rate. Alternatively, hospitals may invest too much in achieving an unnecessary high response rate. The aim of this study is to gain an insight into the MRR on PROMs needed to adequately evaluate THA procedures from a clinical perspective. Methods Retrospective study on prospective collected data of primary, elective THA procedures was performed. MRR was investigated for each PROM (NRS pain at rest, NRS pain during activity, EQ-5D-3L, HOOS-PS, anchor function, OHS, anchor pain and NRS satisfaction) separately to calculate the primary outcome: MRR for the THA PROMs set. MRR on a PROM needed to have (condition 1.) similar PRO change score (3 month score minus preoperative score) including confidence interval, (condition 2.) maintaining the influence of each change score predictor and (condition 3.) equal distribution of each predictor, as those of a 100% PROM response rate group. Per PROM, a 100%-group was identified with all patients having the PRO change score. Randomly assessed groups of 90% till 10% response rate (in total 90 groups) were compared with the 100%-group. Linear mixed model analyses and linear regressions were executed. Results The MRR for the THA PROMs set was 100% (range: 70-100% per PROM). The first condition resulted in a MRR of 60%, the second condition in a MRR of 100% and the third condition in a MRR of 10%. Conclusions A 100% response rate on PROMs is needed in order to adequately evaluate THA procedures from a clinical perspective. All stakeholders using THA PROs should be aware that 100% of the THA patients should respond on both preoperative and 3 month postoperative PROMs. For now, taking the first step in improving evaluation of THA for quality control by achieving at least two of the three conditions of MRR, advised is to require a response rate on PROMs of 60% as the lower limit.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] The impact of age and preoperative health-related quality of life on patient-reported improvements after total hip arthroplasty
    Aalund, Peter K.
    Glassou, Eva N.
    Hansen, Torben B.
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2017, 12 : 1951 - 1956
  • [2] Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery
    Beard, David J.
    Harris, Kristina
    Dawson, Jill
    Doll, Helen
    Murray, David W.
    Carr, Andrew J.
    Price, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [3] Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review
    Celik, Derya
    Coban, Ozge
    Kilicoglu, Onder
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 113 : 44 - 57
  • [4] The outcome of primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients aged 80 years or more
    Clement, N. D.
    MacDonald, D.
    Howie, C. R.
    Biant, L. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (09): : 1265 - 1270
  • [5] The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative
    Davis, A. M.
    Perruccio, A. V.
    Canizares, M.
    Tennant, A.
    Hawker, G. A.
    Conaghan, P. G.
    Roos, E. M.
    Jordan, J. M.
    Maillefert, J. -F.
    Dougados, M.
    Lohmander, L. S.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2008, 16 (05) : 551 - 559
  • [6] Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for Osteoarthritis
    Davis, A. M.
    Perruccio, A. V.
    Canizares, M.
    Hawker, G. A.
    Roos, E. M.
    Maillefert, J. -F.
    Lohmander, L. S.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2009, 17 (07) : 843 - 847
  • [7] Anxiety and depressive symptoms before and after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study
    Duivenvoorden, T.
    Vissers, M. M.
    Verhaar, J. A. N.
    Busschbach, J. J. V.
    Gosens, T.
    Bloem, R. M.
    Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A.
    Reijman, M.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2013, 21 (12) : 1834 - 1840
  • [8] Response rate does not affect patient-reported outcome after lumbar discectomy
    Elkan, P.
    Lagerback, T.
    Moller, H.
    Gerdhem, Paul
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (07) : 1538 - 1546
  • [9] Women in Charnley class C fail to improve in mobility to a higher degree after total hip replacement
    Gordon, Max
    Frumento, Paolo
    Skoldenberg, Olof
    Greene, Meridith
    Garellick, Goran
    Rolfson, Ola
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2014, 85 (04) : 335 - 341
  • [10] Age- and health-related quality of life after total hip replacement Decreasing gains in patients above 70 years of age
    Gordon, Max
    Greene, Meridith
    Frumento, Paolo
    Rolfson, Ola
    Garellick, Garan
    Stark, Andre
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2014, 85 (03) : 244 - 249