Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: Comparison of the extended and modified techniques

被引:151
|
作者
Stone, NN
Stock, RG
Unger, P
机构
[1] MT SINAI SCH MED, DEPT RADIAT ONCOL, NEW YORK, NY USA
[2] MT SINAI SCH MED, DEPT PATHOL, NEW YORK, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1997年 / 158卷 / 05期
关键词
prostate; laparoscopy; lymph nodes; prostatic neoplasms;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64161-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared the results of extended (obturator, hypogastric, common and external iliac nodes) to modified (obturator and hypogastric nodes only) laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 189 patients with stage T1 to T3 prostate cancer underwent modified (150) or extended (39) laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for pelvic nodal assessment before definitive treatment. Results: Twice as many lymph nodes were removed via extended than modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (mean 17.8 versus 9.3). The overall positivity rate was 23 of 189 lymph nodes (12.2%), including 14 of 150 (7.3%) for modified and 9 of 39 (23.1%) for extended dissection (p = 0.02). Two patients (22%) who underwent extended dissection had positive lymph nodes in the external iliac area. Patients who presented with the high risk features of prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 20 ng./ml., Gleason score 7 or greater, or stage T2b disease or greater had a 26.5% (p = 0.0002), 22% (p = 0.0006) or 16.4% (p = 0.003) likelihood of positive lymph nodes, respectively. For extended versus modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection node positivity in high risk patients was 27% versus 18.8% (p = 0.4), 30 versus 26.4% (p = 0.8) and 25.4 versus 14.6% (p = 0.17) for Gleason score 7 or greater, PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. and disease stage T2b to T3a, respectively. Patients who underwent the extended procedure had a higher complication rate (35.9 versus 2%, p <0.0001). No laparotomy was required. Conclusions: Despite yielding a a-fold higher node count and higher node positivity rate, extended laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection offers no advantage over modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for diagnosing positive lymph nodes when results are analyzed by prognostic factors. The extended procedure is associated with a much higher complication rate. In patients with the high risk features of PSA greater than 20 ng./ml., Gleason score 7 or greater and stage T2b to T3a disease modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection can be performed safely and effectively to help identify those who may benefit most from curative therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1891 / 1894
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] ROBOTIC EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION FOR BLADDER CANCER
    Akbulut, Z.
    Canda, A. E.
    Atmaca, A. F.
    Ozdemir, A. T.
    Asil, E.
    Balbay, M. D.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A360 - A360
  • [43] Interobserver Variability of Lymph Node Count in Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer
    Mather, C. A.
    Westerhoff, M.
    Dintzis, S.
    Schmidt, R.
    True, L.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 503A - 503A
  • [44] Extended vs. limited laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: The value of partin tables in selection of the need for and the extent of dissection
    Touijer, Karim
    Rabbani, Farhang
    Romero, Javier
    Secin, Fernando
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A156 - A156
  • [45] Interobserver Variability of Lymph Node Count in Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer
    Mather, C. A.
    Westerhoff, M.
    Dintzis, S.
    Schmidt, R.
    True, L.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 503A - 503A
  • [46] The prognostic value of histopathological nodal features in patients with pelvic lymph node metastases of prostate cancer after extended pelvic lymph node dissection
    Meijer, D.
    Ettema, R. H.
    Van Leeuwen, P. J.
    Van der Poel, H. G.
    Hendrikse, N. H.
    Oprea-Lager, D. E.
    Bekers, E. M.
    Vis, A. N.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1726 - S1727
  • [47] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: Our experience with the first 75 cases
    Feicke, Antje
    Baumgartner, Martin K.
    Schmid, Daniel M.
    Seifert, Helge H.
    Muentener, Michael
    Fatzer, Markus
    Sulser, Tullio
    Strebel, Raeto T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 50 - 51
  • [48] Frequency of lymphoceles after open and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer
    Solberg, A
    Angelsen, A
    Bergan, U
    Haugen, OA
    Viset, T
    Klepp, O
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 37 (03): : 218 - 221
  • [50] Laparoscopic radioisotope guided pelvic lymph node dissection - A novel technique for the staging of prostate cancer
    Corvin, S
    Eichhorn, K
    Schlatter, E
    Wurm, TM
    Bares, R
    Stenzl, A
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 227 - 227