Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: Comparison of the extended and modified techniques

被引:151
|
作者
Stone, NN
Stock, RG
Unger, P
机构
[1] MT SINAI SCH MED, DEPT RADIAT ONCOL, NEW YORK, NY USA
[2] MT SINAI SCH MED, DEPT PATHOL, NEW YORK, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1997年 / 158卷 / 05期
关键词
prostate; laparoscopy; lymph nodes; prostatic neoplasms;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64161-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared the results of extended (obturator, hypogastric, common and external iliac nodes) to modified (obturator and hypogastric nodes only) laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 189 patients with stage T1 to T3 prostate cancer underwent modified (150) or extended (39) laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for pelvic nodal assessment before definitive treatment. Results: Twice as many lymph nodes were removed via extended than modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (mean 17.8 versus 9.3). The overall positivity rate was 23 of 189 lymph nodes (12.2%), including 14 of 150 (7.3%) for modified and 9 of 39 (23.1%) for extended dissection (p = 0.02). Two patients (22%) who underwent extended dissection had positive lymph nodes in the external iliac area. Patients who presented with the high risk features of prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 20 ng./ml., Gleason score 7 or greater, or stage T2b disease or greater had a 26.5% (p = 0.0002), 22% (p = 0.0006) or 16.4% (p = 0.003) likelihood of positive lymph nodes, respectively. For extended versus modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection node positivity in high risk patients was 27% versus 18.8% (p = 0.4), 30 versus 26.4% (p = 0.8) and 25.4 versus 14.6% (p = 0.17) for Gleason score 7 or greater, PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. and disease stage T2b to T3a, respectively. Patients who underwent the extended procedure had a higher complication rate (35.9 versus 2%, p <0.0001). No laparotomy was required. Conclusions: Despite yielding a a-fold higher node count and higher node positivity rate, extended laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection offers no advantage over modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for diagnosing positive lymph nodes when results are analyzed by prognostic factors. The extended procedure is associated with a much higher complication rate. In patients with the high risk features of PSA greater than 20 ng./ml., Gleason score 7 or greater and stage T2b to T3a disease modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection can be performed safely and effectively to help identify those who may benefit most from curative therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1891 / 1894
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IMPACT OF EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION ON ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOME OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Hinev, Alexander I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 669 - 669
  • [32] Extended Salvage Pelvic and Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection due to Prostate Cancer Relapse
    Osmonov, D. K.
    Aksenov, A. V.
    Juenemann, K. -P.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2013, 44 (01) : 50 - 52
  • [33] Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection justified in patients with low risk prostate cancer?
    Briganti, A.
    Da Pozzo, L.
    Suardi, N.
    Gallina, A.
    Salonia, A.
    Bianchi, M.
    Chun, F.
    Graefen, M.
    Huland, H.
    Guazzoni, G.
    Rigatti, P.
    Montorsi, F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 105 - 105
  • [34] Robotic assisted laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection
    Sarvis, Jamey A.
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Reed, Amanda B.
    Miyamoto, Ryan K.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 125 - 125
  • [35] Head to Head Comparison of Nomograms Predicting Probability of Lymph Node Invasion of Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
    Walz, Jochen
    Bladou, Franck
    Rousseau, Bertrand
    Laroche, Julien
    Salem, Naji
    Gravis, Gwenaelle
    Briganti, Alberto
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Fournier, Georges
    UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (03) : 546 - 551
  • [36] Validation of Nomograms Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
    Hinev, Alexander I.
    Anakievski, Deyan
    Kolev, Nikolay H.
    Hadjiev, Vesselin I.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 92 (03) : 300 - 305
  • [37] TEMPLATE-BASED SALVAGE EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER WITH LYMPH NODE METASTASES
    Osmonov, Daniar
    Aksenov, Alexey
    Naumann, Carsten Maik
    Hamann, Moritz
    Juenemann, Klaus-Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E1039 - E1039
  • [38] LAPAROSCOPIC PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE AND BLADDER
    BOWSHER, WG
    CLARKE, A
    CLARKE, DG
    COSTELLO, AJ
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 62 (08): : 634 - 637
  • [39] Preoperative multiparametric MRI of the prostate for the prediction of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection
    Giorgio Brembilla
    Paolo Dell’Oglio
    Armando Stabile
    Alessandro Ambrosi
    Giulia Cristel
    Lisa Brunetti
    Anna Damascelli
    Massimo Freschi
    Antonio Esposito
    Alberto Briganti
    Francesco Montorsi
    Alessandro Del Maschio
    Francesco De Cobelli
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 1969 - 1976
  • [40] Preoperative multiparametric MRI of the prostate for the prediction of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Stabile, Armando
    Ambrosi, Alessandro
    Cristel, Giulia
    Brunetti, Lisa
    Damascelli, Anna
    Freschi, Massimo
    Esposito, Antonio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Del Maschio, Alessandro
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) : 1969 - 1976