Exploring information provision in reconstructive breast surgery: A qualitative study

被引:20
作者
Potter, Shelley [1 ,2 ]
Mills, Nicola [1 ]
Cawthorn, Simon [3 ]
Wilson, Sherif [4 ]
Blazeby, Jane [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Surg Res Ctr, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Div Surg Head & Neck, Bristol BS2 8HW, Avon, England
[3] Southmead Hosp, North Bristol NHS Trust, Breast Care Ctr, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[4] North Bristol NHS Trust, Dept Plast Surg, Bristol BS16 1LE, Avon, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Information; Decision-making; Breast cancer; Oncology; Qualitative study; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; MIXED METHODS; CARE; CANCER; AID; COMMUNICATION; SERVICES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2015.09.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Women considering reconstructive breast surgery (RBS) require adequate information to make informed treatment decisions. This study explored patients' and health professionals' (HPs) perceptions of the adequacy of information provided for decision-making in RBS. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patients who had undergone RBS and HPs providing specialist care explored participants' experiences of information provision prior to RBS. Results: Professionals reported providing standardised verbal, written and photographic information about the process and outcomes of surgery. Women, by contrast, reported varying levels of information provision. Some felt fully-informed but others perceived they had received insufficient information about available treatment options or possible outcomes of surgery to make an informed decision. Conclusions: Women need adequate information to make informed decisions about RBS and current practice may not meet women's needs. Minimum agreed standards of information provision, especially about alternative types of reconstruction, are recommended to improve decision-making in RBS. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 738
页数:7
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
[2]   Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].
Barbour, RS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1115-1117
[3]  
Blencowe N, 2011, BMJ BLOG
[4]   Clinicians' concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making [J].
Caldon, Lisa J. M. ;
Collins, Karen A. ;
Reed, Malcolm W. ;
Sivell, Stephanie ;
Austoker, Joan ;
Clements, Alison M. ;
Patnick, Julietta ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 (02) :133-146
[5]   Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews [J].
Clarke, Mike .
TRIALS, 2007, 8 (1)
[6]  
Clarke T, 2010, NEW DR, V3, P10
[7]  
COMET Initiative C, 2011, COR OUTC MEAS EFF TR
[8]   Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer [J].
Cordeiro, Peter G. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (15) :1590-1601
[9]   Not listening to patients - The use and misuse of patient satisfaction studies [J].
Crawford, MJ ;
Kessel, AS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 45 (01) :1-6
[10]   Rethinking patient satisfaction: patient experiences of an open access flexible sigmoidoscopy service [J].
Dougall, A ;
Russell, A ;
Rubin, G ;
Ling, J .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 50 (01) :53-62