Online Academic Integrity

被引：9

作者：

Mastin, David F. ^{[1
]}

Peszka, Jennifer ^{[1
]}

Lilly, Deborah R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Psychol, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA

来源：

TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY | 2009年 / 36卷 / 03期

关键词：

DISHONESTY; CODES;

D O I：

10.1080/00986280902739768

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

Psychology students completed a task with reinforcement for successful performance. We tested academic integrity under randomly assigned conditions of check mark acknowledgment of an honor pledge, typed honor pledge, or no pledge. Across all conditions, 14.1% of students inflated their self-reported performance (i.e., cheated). We found no significant differences in the likelihood of cheating under differing honor pledge conditions. Students were more likely to cheat in late semester (20.2% and 16.0%) compared to the early semester condition (9.6%). Our research is important in understanding the frequency and timing of online academic dishonesty.

引用

页码：174 / 178

页数：5

共 15 条

[11] Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments - A qualitative investigation [J].

McCabe, DL ;

Trevino, LK ;

Butterfield, KD .

JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1999, 70 (02) :211-+

[12] ACADEMIC DISHONESTY - HONOR CODES AND OTHER CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCES [J].

MCCABE, DL ;

TREVINO, LK .

JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1993, 64 (05) :522-538

[13] Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity:: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings [J].

McCabe, DL ;

Treviño, LK ;

Butterfield, KD .

RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2002, 43 (03) :357-378

[14]

Ridley D.R., 1998, J INSTR PSYCHOL, V25, P184

[15] FACTORS IN STUDENTS DISHONESTY [J].

SINGHAL, AC .

PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1982, 51 (03) :775-780

← 1 2 →