Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges

被引:9
|
作者
Ozcaglayan, Tugba Ilkem Kurtoglu [1 ]
Oznur, Meltem [2 ]
机构
[1] Liv Hosp Vadistanbul, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Tekirdag Namik Kemal Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Tekirdag, Turkey
关键词
Breast; cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; ultrasound; INVASIVE MICROPAPILLARY CARCINOMA; SONOGRAPHIC FINDINGS; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; LESIONS; FEATURES; FORM;
D O I
10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to investigate mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of papillary breast carcinoma subtypes and to compare the diagnostic features and performance of the imaging method in distinguishing subtypes. Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients presenting with pathological diagnosis of 45 papillary carcinoma lesions, between 2014 and 2019, were included. Cases were assigned to five subgroups according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The clinical characteristics (n = 45) and imaging features of each pathological subgroup were retrospectively related to imaging findings from US (n = 45), MG (n = 37), and breast MRI (n = 23), and further compared. Results: The finding of a palpable mass in all subgroups was more common than nipple discharge on clinical breast evaluation, and no significant difference was found between the subgroups. Irregular shape on MG (10/12, 83.3%, p = 0.039) and US (11/12, 91.7%, p = 0.039) was found more frequently in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) compared to other subgroups. Circumscribed margins (4/5, 80%, p = 0.002) occurred more frequently in papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (pDCIS) and encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) than in other subgroups (6/8, 75%, p = 0.002). Lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were found in solid papillary cancer (SPC) than in other subgroups (ADC = 0.35 x 10(-3), p = 0.017). Conclusion: Radiological findings of papillary carcinomas overlap with each other. US and MRI are complementary when revealing specific morphological characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 181
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail
    Nóra Lubina
    Ulla Schedelbeck
    Anne Roth
    Andreas Max Weng
    Eva Geissinger
    Arnd Hönig
    Dietbert Hahn
    Thorsten Alexander Bley
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 1285 - 1293
  • [42] Comments on "Evaluation of the Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspect Breast Lesions''
    An, Yongyu
    CLINICS, 2020, 75
  • [43] Magnetic resonance imaging and pathological characteristics of pure mucinous carcinoma in the breast according to echogenicity on ultrasonography
    Shin, Young Gyung
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Yoon, Jung Hyun
    Moon, Hee Jung
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2017, 36 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [44] Comparison of Diagnostic Efficiency of Breast Cancer Imaging in Chinese Women: Digital Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI, and Combinations of These Modalities
    Wang, Juan
    Chen, Huanhuan
    Wu, Xianhua
    Tang, Lemin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2015, 5 (07) : 1488 - 1493
  • [45] The diagnostic value of digital breast tomosynthesis with complementary ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of postoperative changes and locoregional recurrence of breast cancer
    Mai M. K. Barakat
    Eman K. A. E. Mohamed
    Lobna A. E. Habib
    Mortada Elsayed Ahmed
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 53
  • [46] DIAGNOSTIC VALUES OF MAMMOGRAPHY, ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND DYNAMIC ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN BREAST LESIONS
    Basara, Isil
    Orguc, Sebnem
    Coskun, Teoman
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2011, 7 (02): : 118 - 126
  • [47] Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
    Kim, Eun Young
    Youn, Inyoung
    Lee, Kwan Ho
    Yun, Ji-Sup
    Park, Yong Lai
    Park, Chan Heun
    Moon, Juhee
    Choi, Seon Hyeong
    Choi, Yoon Jung
    Ham, Soo-Youn
    Kook, Shin Ho
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (04) : 453 - 462
  • [48] Diagnostic Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer in Dense Breast Tissues
    Xu, Hongfang
    Zeng, Wei
    Fu, Zehong
    Cui, Qing
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (04)
  • [49] Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Phenotypes May Provide Additional Information for Risk Stratification for Encapsulated Papillary Carcinoma of the Breast
    Tang, Wen-Jie
    Liang, Yun-Shi
    Yan, Jing
    Hu, Yue
    Sun, Mei-Li
    Liu, Guo-Shun
    Pan, Xiao-Huan
    Wei, Xin-Hua
    Jiang, Xin-Qing
    Guo, Yuan
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 11751 - 11760
  • [50] Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Acar, Cagdas Riza
    Orguc, Sebnem
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2024, 24 (06) : 481 - 493