Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges

被引:9
|
作者
Ozcaglayan, Tugba Ilkem Kurtoglu [1 ]
Oznur, Meltem [2 ]
机构
[1] Liv Hosp Vadistanbul, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Tekirdag Namik Kemal Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Tekirdag, Turkey
关键词
Breast; cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; ultrasound; INVASIVE MICROPAPILLARY CARCINOMA; SONOGRAPHIC FINDINGS; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; LESIONS; FEATURES; FORM;
D O I
10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to investigate mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of papillary breast carcinoma subtypes and to compare the diagnostic features and performance of the imaging method in distinguishing subtypes. Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients presenting with pathological diagnosis of 45 papillary carcinoma lesions, between 2014 and 2019, were included. Cases were assigned to five subgroups according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The clinical characteristics (n = 45) and imaging features of each pathological subgroup were retrospectively related to imaging findings from US (n = 45), MG (n = 37), and breast MRI (n = 23), and further compared. Results: The finding of a palpable mass in all subgroups was more common than nipple discharge on clinical breast evaluation, and no significant difference was found between the subgroups. Irregular shape on MG (10/12, 83.3%, p = 0.039) and US (11/12, 91.7%, p = 0.039) was found more frequently in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) compared to other subgroups. Circumscribed margins (4/5, 80%, p = 0.002) occurred more frequently in papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (pDCIS) and encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) than in other subgroups (6/8, 75%, p = 0.002). Lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were found in solid papillary cancer (SPC) than in other subgroups (ADC = 0.35 x 10(-3), p = 0.017). Conclusion: Radiological findings of papillary carcinomas overlap with each other. US and MRI are complementary when revealing specific morphological characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 181
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Solid Papillary Carcinoma of the Breast: Magnetic Resonance Mammography, Digital Mammography, and Ultrasound Findings
    You, Chao
    Peng, Weijun
    Shen, Xuxia
    Zhi, Wenxiang
    Yang, Wentao
    Gu, Yajia
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2018, 42 (05) : 771 - 775
  • [2] Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers
    Kim, Won Hwa
    Chang, Jung Min
    Moon, Hyeong-Gon
    Yi, Ann
    Koo, Hye Ryoung
    Gweon, Hye Mi
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (06) : 1556 - 1564
  • [3] Imaging Findings in Papillary Breast Lesions: An Analysis of Ductal Findings on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound
    Sarica, Ozgur
    Dokdok, Murat
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2018, 42 (04) : 542 - 551
  • [4] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Breast Encapsulated Papillary Carcinoma
    Jiang, Tingting
    Tang, Wei
    Gu, Yajia
    Xu, Midie
    Yang, Wentao
    Peng, Weijun
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2018, 42 (04) : 536 - 541
  • [5] Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and mammography for breast cancer
    Zhang, Yueqiao
    Ren, Hong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (05) : 862 - 868
  • [6] Diagnostic performance of mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating mammographically visible breast masses
    Zhu, Xueli
    Cao, Yi
    Li, Ruidie
    Zhu, Mingxia
    Chen, Xin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (09)
  • [7] Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis for predicting response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and full-field digital mammography
    Murakami, Ryusuke
    Tani, Hitomi
    Kumita, Shinichiro
    Uchiyama, Nachiko
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2021, 10 (12)
  • [8] 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail
    Lubina, Nora
    Schedelbeck, Ulla
    Roth, Anne
    Weng, Andreas Max
    Geissinger, Eva
    Hoenig, Arnd
    Hahn, Dietbert
    Bley, Thorsten Alexander
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (05) : 1285 - 1293
  • [9] Diagnostic evaluations of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in mammary duct ectasia and breast cancer
    Song, Lei
    Li, Liang
    Liu, Bin
    Yu, Dexin
    Sun, Fengguo
    Guo, Mingming
    Ruan, Zhengmin
    Zhang, Feixue
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 15 (02) : 1698 - 1706
  • [10] Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women
    Tang, Wei
    Hu, Fei-Xiang
    Zhu, Hui
    Wang, Qi-Feng
    Gu, Ya-Jia
    Peng, Wei-Jun
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2017, 66 (02) : 105 - 116