Primary Stability of Cylindrical and Conical Dental Implants in Relation to Insertion TorqueA Comparative Ex Vivo Evaluation

被引:24
作者
Staedt, Henning
Palarie, Victor [1 ]
Staedt, Arne
Wolf, Jens M. [2 ]
Lehmann, Karl Martin [3 ]
Ottl, Peter [2 ]
Kaemmerer, Peer W. [4 ]
机构
[1] State Univ Med & Pharm N Testemitanu, Lab Tissue Engn, Kishinev, Moldova
[2] Univ Rostock, Dept Prosthodont & Mat Sci, Rostock, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Prosthet Dent, Mainz, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Rostock, Dept Oral Maxillofacial & Plast Surg, Schillingallee 35, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
关键词
dental implant; geometry; removal force; insertion depth; RESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION VELOCITY; MINI-IMPLANTS; TAPERED IMPLANTS; IN-VITRO; BONE; VALUES; PLACEMENT; DENSITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1097/ID.0000000000000531
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction:The aim of this ex vivo study was to investigate the influence of different insertion torques on primary stability of a conical and a cylindrical implant system.Materials and Methods:Thirty-two dental implants (Astra Tech OsseoSpeed 5.0 S x 11 mm cylindrical [n = 16] and 5.0 x 11 mm conical [n = 16]) were inserted with 20, 30, 40, and 45 N<bold>cm into fresh porcine bone of mixed trabecular</bold>-cortical quality. Before insertion, bone quality was assessed via cone beam tomography. After insertion, resonance frequency analysis was reported using the implant stability quotient (ISQ). Implant insertion depths were evaluated, and the implants were pushed out of the bone by force (measured in N). All experiments were done with n = 4 per group.Results:The highest ISQ (mean 78.25 2.9) and pushout values (mean 675 N +/- 5.8) were measured for the cylindrical implant after insertion using 30 N<bold>cm</bold>. The conical implant showed the highest primary stability by means of ISQ (mean 76.25 +/- 2.2) and pushout force (mean 502.5 N +/- 9.6) after an insertion torque of 40 N<bold>cm</bold>. If more insertion force was used, primary stability was reduced in all cases.Conclusion:The data indicate that different forms of an implant system need different insertion torques to obtain an optimal primary stability. These results have to be verified clinically.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 255
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Al-Nawas B, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P726
[2]   Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone [J].
Bilhan, H. ;
Geckili, O. ;
Mumcu, E. ;
Bozdag, E. ;
Sunbuloglu, E. ;
Kutay, O. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 37 (12) :900-907
[3]   Reliability and validity of the instrumental assessment of implant stability in dry human mandibles [J].
Brouwers, J. E. I. G. ;
Lobbezoo, F. ;
Visscher, C. M. ;
Wismeijer, D. ;
Naeije, M. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2009, 36 (04) :279-283
[4]   EFFECT OF IMPLANT DESIGN ON INITIAL STABILITY OF TAPERED IMPLANTS [J].
Chong, Linus ;
Khocht, Ahmed ;
Suzuki, Jon B. ;
Gaughan, John .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2009, 35 (03) :130-135
[5]   The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants [J].
dos Santos, Mychelle Vianna ;
Elias, Carlos Nelson ;
Cavalcanti Lima, Jose Henrique .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (03) :215-223
[6]  
Drago CJ, 2006, INT J PERIODONT REST, V26, P337
[7]  
García-Vives N, 2009, MED ORAL PATOL ORAL, V14, pE455
[8]  
Ivanoff CJ, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P103
[9]   Implant Surface Morphology and Primary Stability: Is There a Connection? [J].
Javed, Fawad ;
Almas, Khalid ;
Crespi, Roberto ;
Romanos, George E. .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (01) :40-46
[10]   Quality of dental implants [J].
Jokstad, A ;
Braegger, U ;
Brunski, JB ;
Carr, AB ;
Naert, I ;
Wennerberg, A .
INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2003, 53 (06) :409-443