Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI ≥ 50kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass

被引:158
作者
Prachand, Vivek N. [1 ]
DaVee, Roy T. [1 ]
Alverdy, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000239086.30518.2a
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Although weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is acceptable in patients with preoperative body mass index (BMI) between 35 and 50 kg/m(2), results from several series demonstrate that failure rates approach 40% when BMI is >= 50 kg/m(2). Here we report the first large single institution series directly comparing weight-loss outcomes in super-obese patients following biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (DS) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). Methods: All super-obese patients (BMI >= 50 kg/m(2)) undergoing standardized laparoscopic and open DS and RYGB between August 2002 and October 2005 were identified from a prospective database. Two-sample t tests were used to compare weight loss, decrease in BMI, and percentage of excess body weight loss (% EBWL) after surgery. chi(2) analysis was used to determine the rate of successful weight loss, defined as achieving at least 50% loss of excess body weight. Results: A total of 350 super-obese patients underwent DS (n = 198) or RYGB (n = 152) with equal 30-day mortality (DS, 1 of 198; RYGB, 0 of 152; P = not significant). The % EBWL at follow-up was greater for DS than RY (12 months, 64.1% vs. 55.9%; 18 months, 71.9% vs. 62.8%; 24 months, 71.6% vs. 60.1%; 36 months, 68.9% vs. 54.9%; P < 0.05). Total weight loss and decrease in BMI were also statistically greater for the DS (data not shown). Importantly, the likelihood of successful weight loss (EBWL >50%) was significantly greater in patients following DS (12 months, 83.9% vs. 70.4%: 18 months. 90.3% vs. 75.9%; 36 months, 84.2% vs. 59.3%; P < 0, 05). Conclusions: Direct comparison of DS to RYGB demonstrates superior weight loss outcomes for DS.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 619
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The duodenal switch operation for the treatment of morbid obesity [J].
Anthone, GJ ;
Lord, RVN ;
DeMeester, TR ;
Crookes, PF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (04) :618-627
[2]   Extremely high body mass index is not a contraindication to laparoscopic gastric bypass [J].
Artuso, D ;
Wayne, M ;
Kaul, A ;
Bairamian, M ;
Teixeira, J ;
Cerabona, T .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2004, 14 (06) :750-754
[3]   Twenty years of biliopancreatic diversion: what is the goal of the surgery? [J].
Biron, S ;
Hould, FS ;
Lebel, S ;
Marceau, S ;
Lescelleur, O ;
Simard, S ;
Marceau, P .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2004, 14 (02) :160-164
[4]   Nutritional deficiencies following bariatric surgery: What have we learned? [J].
Bloomberg, RD ;
Fleishman, A ;
Nalle, JE ;
Herron, DM ;
Kini, S .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2005, 15 (02) :145-154
[5]   Outcome following bariatric surgery in super versus morbidly obese patients: Does weight matter? [J].
Bloomston, M ;
Zervos, EE ;
Camps, MA ;
Goode, SE ;
Rosemurgy, AS .
OBESITY SURGERY, 1997, 7 (05) :414-419
[6]   LONG-LIMB GASTRIC BYPASS IN THE SUPEROBESE - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY [J].
BROLIN, RE ;
KENLER, HA ;
GORMAN, JH ;
CODY, RP .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 215 (04) :387-395
[7]   Malabsorptive gastric bypass in patients with superobesity [J].
Brolin, RE ;
LaMarca, LB ;
Kenler, HA ;
Cody, RP .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2002, 6 (02) :195-203
[8]   Bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Buchwald, H ;
Avidor, Y ;
Braunwald, E ;
Jensen, MD ;
Pories, W ;
Fahrbach, K ;
Schoelles, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (14) :1724-1737
[9]   Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003 [J].
Buchwald, H ;
Williams, SE .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2004, 14 (09) :1157-1164
[10]  
Carlin Arthur M, 2006, Surg Obes Relat Dis, V2, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2005.12.001