Energy use in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS): A review

被引:157
作者
Badiola, M. [1 ]
Basurko, O. C. [1 ]
Piedrahita, R. [2 ]
Hundley, P. [3 ]
Mendiola, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] AZTI, Marine Res Div, Sukarrieta 48395, Spain
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] HTH AquaMetr Llc, 3124 Creek View Rd, Hiawassee, GA USA
关键词
Energy use; Recirculating aquaculture systems; Environment; Optimized-designs; Cost-effectiveness; Sustainability; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC TREATMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; TRICKLING FILTERS; VENTILATORY FREQUENCY; OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION; GEOTHERMAL-ENERGY; SUSPENDED-SOLIDS; NITROGEN REMOVAL; WATER-TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaeng.2018.03.003
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Recirculating aquaculture systems (RASs) are intensive fish production systems, with reduced use of water and land. However, their high energy requirement is a drawback, which increases both operational costs and the potential impacts created by the use of fossil fuels. Energy use in RAS has been studied indirectly and/or mentioned in several publications. Nevertheless, its importance and impacts have not been studied. In aiming to achieve economic and environmentally sustainable production a compromise has to be found between water use, waste discharge, energy consumption and productivity. The current review discusses published studies about energy use and RAS designs efficiencies. Moreover, with the aim of making an industry baseline study a survey about the energy use in commercial scale RAS was conducted. The design of more efficient and less energy dependent RAS is presented, including optimized unit processes, system integration and equipment selection. The main conclusions are: fossil based fuels are less cost-effective than renewable energies; energy is of little concern for the majority of the industry, and renewable energies are of potential use in RAS.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 70
页数:14
相关论文
共 182 条
  • [1] Accounting frameworks for tracking energy efficiency trends
    Ang, B. W.
    Mu, A. R.
    Zhou, P.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (05) : 1209 - 1219
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2014
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, Biomass for Power Generation, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) Copyright IRENA 2012
  • [4] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [5] Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using life cycle assessment
    Aubin, J.
    Papatryphon, E.
    van der Werf, H. M. G.
    Chatzifotis, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (03) : 354 - 361
  • [6] Characterisation of the environmental impact of a turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) re-circulating production system using Life Cycle Assessment
    Aubin, J.
    Papatryphon, E.
    Van der Werf, H. M. G.
    Petit, J.
    Morvan, Y. M.
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2006, 261 (04) : 1259 - 1268
  • [7] Carbon nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems
    Avnimelech, Y
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 1999, 176 (3-4) : 227 - 235
  • [8] Feeding with microbial flocs by tilapia in minimal discharge bio-flocs technology ponds
    Avnimelech, Yoram
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2007, 264 (1-4) : 140 - 147
  • [9] Evaluation of nitrogen uptake and excretion by tilapia in bio floc tanks, using 15N tracing
    Avnimelech, Yoram
    Kochba, Malka
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2009, 287 (1-2) : 163 - 168
  • [10] Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies: life cycle assessment of salmonid culture systems in Canada
    Ayer, Nathan W.
    Tyedmers, Peter H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (03) : 362 - 373