Electrophysiological characteristics of septal perforation during left bundle branch pacing

被引:47
作者
Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram [1 ,4 ]
Basil, William [2 ]
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [3 ]
机构
[1] Velammal Med Coll, Madurai, India
[2] Medtron India Pvt Ltd, Madurai, India
[3] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Geisinger Heart Inst, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
[4] Velammal Med Coll, Hosp & Res Inst, Dept Cardiol, Madurai 625009, Tamilnadu, India
关键词
Current of injury; Left bundle branch pacing; Pacing impedance; Septal perforation; Template beat; Unfiltered unipolar electrogram; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.01.018
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) provides a low and stable threshold by direct capture of left bundle fibers on the left ventricular subendocardium. As the procedure involves the deployment of the pacing lead deep inside the septum, septal perforation is a potential complication. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to analyze the morphology of intracardiac electrograms and unipolar pacing parameters to identify septal perforation in patients undergoing LBBP. METHODS Patients who had undergone successful LBBP between January 2020 to November 2021 were retrospectively included in the study. RESULTS LBBP was attempted in 219 patients and was successful in 212 (96.8% success rate). Septal perforation during lead deployment was identified in 30 patients (14.1%). Peak troponin release was 188 +/- 162 pg/mL. Mean unipolar impedance during septal perforation was 404.6 +/- 19.9 Omega (400-450 Omega in 16 patients [53.3%]; < 400 id in 14 patients [46.7%]). A cutoff < 450 Omega for diagnosing septal perforation had high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (96.6%). Current of injury amplitude reduced from 15.4 +/- 11.6 mV just before perforation to 0.9 +/- 0.6 mV after perforation. Based on morphology, unfiltered unipolar electrograms were classified into 2 patterns: (1) type I (QS) seen in 20 patients (67%) due to complete perforation (mean unipolar impedance 402.5 +/- 20.4 Omega); and (2) type II (RS/rS) seen in 10 patients (33%) due to partial perforation, with 80% showing capture (mean impedance 411 +/- 21.3 Omega). All 30 patients underwent successful reimplantation at a new site. No patient developed lead dislodgment during mean follow-up of 9.9 +/- 6.7 months. CONCLUSION Although considered one of the concerns of LBBP, septal perforation, when recognized promptly during implantation by unipolar parameters and treated by reimplantation, would be benign and not associated with an unfavorable outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 734
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Approach to Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Katta, Maanya Rajasree
    Abouzid, Mohamed Riad Abdelgawad
    Hameed, Maha
    Kaur, Jasneet
    Balasubramanian, Suryakumar
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2025, 33 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [22] Defining the distance between the His bundle and first septal perforator: implications for left bundle branch pacing
    Bocchese, Matthew
    Gannon, Michael
    Patil, Pravin
    Van Decker, William
    Whitman, Isaac R.
    Cronin, Edmond M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (05) : 1113 - 1117
  • [23] Differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: An algorithm based on intracardiac electrophysiology
    Chen, Xing
    Qian, Zhiyong
    Zou, Fengwei
    Wang, Yao
    Zhang, Xinwei
    Qiu, Yuanhao
    Hou, Xiaofeng
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Zou, Jiangang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (03) : 448 - 457
  • [24] Characteristics and proposed mechanisms of QRS morphology observed during the left bundle branch pacing procedure
    Shimeno, Kenji
    Tamura, Shota
    Nakatsuji, Kenichi
    Hayashi, Yusuke
    Abe, Yukio
    Naruko, Takahiko
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (12): : 1987 - 1994
  • [25] Occurrence of ventricular septal perforation in patients with permanent left bundle branch pacing followed up using echocardiographic and computed tomography images
    Li, Qiaoyuan
    Dai, Wenlong
    Fang, Dongping
    Ma, Weili
    Lin, Cancan
    Lu, Chunshan
    He, Dongfang
    Liu, Xu
    Guo, Chengjun
    [J]. ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2022, 27 (06)
  • [26] Left Ventricular Septal Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing A New Beginning in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Nayak, Hemal M.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (04) : 360 - 362
  • [27] Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Braunstein, Eric D.
    Marin, Jorge
    Nino, Cesar
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Cabanillas, Nestor Lopez
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Velasco, Alejandro
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    [J]. JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (02) : 295 - 305
  • [28] Pacing Characteristics of His Bundle Pacing vs. Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhuo, Wen
    Zhong, Xiaojie
    Liu, Hualong
    Yu, Jianhua
    Chen, Qi
    Hu, Jinzhu
    Xiong, Qinmei
    Hong, Kui
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [29] His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure
    Paluszkiewicz, Patrycja
    Martuszewski, Adrian
    Radziejewska, Jadwiga
    Zawadzki, Jacek
    Smereka, Jacek
    Gajek, Jacek
    [J]. BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [30] Retrograde Conduction in Left Bundle Branch Block Insights From Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Basil, William
    Ganesan, Vithiya
    Syed, Thabish
    Ramalingam, Vadivelu
    Mariappan, Selvaganesh
    Anand, Vijesh
    Murugan, Senthil
    Kumar, Mahesh
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    [J]. JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (08) : 1885 - 1895