Can Technology Compensate for a Labor Shortage? Effects of 287(g) Immigration Policies on the US Dairy IndustryJEL codes

被引:20
作者
Charlton, Diane [1 ]
Kostandini, Genti [2 ]
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Econ, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Agr & Appl Econ, Athens, GA 30602 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
dairy production; farm labor; immigration policy; technology adoption; J61; O33; Q16; E-VERIFY MANDATES; ENFORCEMENT; IMPACT; EMPLOYMENT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/ajae.12125
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
We leverage spatial and temporal variation in the implementation of county-level 287(g) immigration enforcement policies as a quasi-experiment to measure the effects of an inward shift in the local immigrant labor supply on U.S. dairy operations. Our findings show that 287(g) policies cause production and labor expenditures per farm to decrease and labor efficiency to increase. The primary dairy operator is more likely to have off-farm income, and dairies are more likely to use select labor-saving technologies after 287(g) is implemented. Nevertheless, the number of dairies in operation, total milk production, and average dairy size in the county decline. Our findings indicate that the dairy industry became more labor efficient and technologically advanced as a result of the 287(g) program. However, total production declined. We conclude that technological gains in the dairy industry were insufficient to entirely offset the negative shock to production resulting from an inward shift in labor supply, at least in the short run. These findings are of importance for labor-intensive industries that could potentially experience an adverse labor supply shock.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 89
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adcock F., 2015, EC IMPACTS IMMIGRANT
[2]   Deporting "Bad Hombres"? The Profile of Deportees under Widespread Versus Prioritized Enforcement [J].
Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina ;
Puttitanun, Thitima ;
Martinez-Donate, Ana P. .
INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION REVIEW, 2019, 53 (02) :518-547
[3]   The Labor Market Impact of Mandated Employment Verification Systems [J].
Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina ;
Bansak, Cynthia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (03) :543-548
[4]  
Autor D, 2018, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1
[5]   Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation [J].
Autor, David H. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 29 (03) :3-30
[6]   Invited review: Changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare [J].
Barkema, H. W. ;
von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. ;
Kastelic, J. P. ;
Lam, T. J. G. M. ;
Luby, C. ;
Roy, J. -P. ;
LeBlanc, S. J. ;
Keefe, G. P. ;
Kelton, D. F. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (11) :7426-7445
[7]  
Bohn S, 2017, IND RELAT, V56, P236, DOI 10.1111/irel.12172
[8]   Do E-Verify Mandates Improve Labor Market Outcomes of Low-Skilled Native and Legal Immigrant Workers? [J].
Bohn, Sarah ;
Lofstrom, Magnus ;
Raphael, Steven .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2015, 81 (04) :960-979
[9]  
Brynjolsson E., 2014, The Second Machine Age
[10]  
Capps Marc R., 2011, DELEGATION DIVERGENC