The dynamics of global public research funding on climate change, energy, transport, and industrial decarbonisation

被引:31
作者
AbdulRafiu, Abbas [1 ]
Sovacool, Benjamin K. [1 ]
Daniels, Chux [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sci Policy Res Unit SPRU, Business Sch, Falmer, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Public research funding; Climate change adaptation; Energy transitions; Technology innovation; Carbon emission; Interdisciplinary; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; TRANSITIONS; KNOWLEDGE; US; PERSPECTIVE; ENVIRONMENT; BENEFITS; TRENDS; GRANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112420
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper explores the funding trends, topical themes, and notable gaps in global public research funding across the areas of energy, climate change, transport, and industrial decarbonisation from 1990 to 2020. The paper organizes its analysis along the themes of financial and spatial patterns of funding, patterns of disciplinary funding, and the temporality (and shifting research priorities) within funding patterns. It finds that funding for energy and climate research remains concentrated within the European Commission, United Kingdom and United States. Climate change adaptation research is the most funded general area, and the specific topics of energy efficiency, climate resilience, and climate information systems, managing climate risks, energy storage, carbon dioxide removal and solar energy are the most funded technologies. There is significant diversity in the disciplines funded, with the social sciences supported almost as much as the engineering and physical sciences and meaningful amounts of funding disbursed to the arts and humanities and the life sciences. A large majority of projects identify themselves as transdisciplinary. The paper, lastly, discusses research gaps and future research questions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 76 条
[51]   Expanding use of archaeology in climate change response by changing its social environment [J].
Rockman, Marcy ;
Hritz, Carrie .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (15) :8295-8302
[52]  
Roos M, 2021, CLIMATE EC, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-48423-1_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-48423-1_2]
[53]  
Russell LM., 2015, 2015 AAAS ANN M
[54]   Saving innovative climate and energy research: Four recommendations for Mission Innovation [J].
Sanchez, Daniel L. ;
Sivaram, Varun .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 29 :123-126
[55]   Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change [J].
Schot, Johan ;
Steinmueller, W. Edward .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (09) :1554-1567
[56]   Towards a new social science research agenda for hydrogen transitions: Social practices, energy justice, and place attachment [J].
Scott, Matthew ;
Powells, Gareth .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61
[57]  
Senshaw D, 2020, 11 GGGI
[58]   Evaluating relative benefits of different types of R & D for clean energy technologies [J].
Shayegh, Soheil ;
Sanchez, Daniel L. ;
Caldeira, Ken .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 107 :532-538
[59]  
Slezak K., 2013, SSRN ELECT J, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2257783
[60]   Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment [J].
Smith, Wake ;
Wagner, Gernot .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (12)