Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research

被引：310

作者：

Humphrey-Murto, Susan ^{[1
]}

Varpio, Lara ^{[2
]}

Gonsalves, Carol ^{[1
]}

Wood, Timothy J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Ottawa, Div Rheumatol, Ottawa, ON, Canada

[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA

来源：

MEDICAL TEACHER | 2017年 / 39卷 / 01期

关键词：

RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES;

D O I：

10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

Consensus group methods are widely used in research to identify and measure areas where incomplete evidence exists for decision-making. Despite their widespread use, these methods are often inconsistently used and reported. Using examples from the three most commonly used methods, the Delphi, Nominal Group and RAND/UCLA; this paper and associated Guide aim to describe these methods and to highlight common weaknesses in methodology and reporting. The paper outlines a series of recommendations to assist researchers using consensus group methods in providing a comprehensive description and justification of the steps taken in their study.

引用

页码：14 / 19

页数：6

共 36 条

[1]

Black N, 1999, J Health Serv Res Policy, V4, P236

[2] Useful but no Oracle: reflections on the use of a Delphi Group in a multi-methods policy research study [J].