Supplying the wildlife trade as a livelihood strategy in a biodiversity hotspot

被引:29
|
作者
Robinson, Janine E. [1 ]
Griffiths, Richard A. [1 ]
Fraser, Iain M. [2 ,3 ]
Raharimalala, Jessica [4 ]
Roberts, David L. [1 ]
St John, Freya A. V. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Sch Anthropol & Conservat, Durrell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury, Kent, England
[2] Univ Kent, Sch Econ, Canterbury, Kent, England
[3] La Trobe Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[4] Madagasikara Voakajy, Antananarivo, Madagascar
[5] Bangor Univ, Sch Environm Nat Resources & Geog, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2018年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
amphibians; CBD; CITES; conservation; livelihoods; Madagascar; reptiles; RURAL HOUSEHOLDS; GLOBAL TRADE; CONSERVATION; BUSHMEAT; CONSUMPTION; DYNAMICS; INCOME; POVERTY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.5751/ES-09821-230113
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Much of the global wildlife trade is sourced from biodiversity-rich developing countries. These often have high levels of poverty and habitat loss, particularly in rural areas where many depend on natural resources. However, wildlife collection may incentivize local people to conserve habitats that support their livelihoods. Here we examined the contribution of the commercial collection of live animals to rural livelihoods in Madagascar, one of the world's most important biodiversity hotspots. Using questionnaires, we investigated the prevalence, profitability relative to other livelihood activities, and local importance of the trade, and its capacity to provide incentives for conservation. Thirteen percent of households were engaged in live animal collection in the study area (similar to 5% trapped reptiles and amphibians and the remainder trapped invertebrates). This formed part of a diverse livelihood strategy, and was more profitable than other activities (in terms of returns per unit of effort), with median earnings of similar to US$100 per season (similar to 25% of Gross National Income per year). However, trapping was part-time, usually undertaken by poorer members of the community, and often perceived as opportunistic, risky, and financially unreliable. Further, trappers and nontrappers held similar perceptions regarding conservation, suggesting wildlife trade currently does not incentivize enhanced stewardship of traded species and their habitats. Our study brings together a range of methodologies to present the most comprehensive insights into livelihoods and conservation in poor rural communities involved in the commercial collection of live animals to supply international trade. This improved understanding of the wider socioeconomic dimensions of wildlife trade can inform policy and management interventions for both the threats and opportunities associated with global trade in biodiversity both in Madagascar and more generally.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unraveling the non-linear associations between the international legal wildlife trade and biodiversity
    Wu, Tianyi
    Jia, Shuangrui
    Fan, Gengjie
    Xu, Zihan
    Liu, Yanxu
    Hu, Tao
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2025, 304
  • [32] Livelihood roles of cattle and prospects for alternative land uses at the wildlife/livestock interface in South Africa
    Chaminuka, Petronella
    Udo, Henk M. J.
    Eilers, Karen C. H. A. M.
    van der Zijpp, Akke
    LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 38 : 80 - 90
  • [33] Effect and difference between the threatened and endemic status on the general public support towards wildlife species in a biodiversity hotspot
    Espinosa-Molina, Martin
    Rodriguez-Jorquera, Ignacio A.
    Beckmann, Volker
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 30 (11) : 3219 - 3241
  • [34] Hunting for a Living: Wildlife Trade, Rural Livelihoods and Declining Wildlife in the Hkakaborazi National Park, North Myanmar
    Rao, Madhu
    Zaw, Than
    Htun, Saw
    Myint, Than
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 48 (01) : 158 - 167
  • [35] Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services within a global biodiversity hotspot
    Lin, Shiwei
    Wu, Ruidong
    Yang, Feiling
    Wang, Junjun
    Wu, Wei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 371 - 381
  • [36] The erosion of biodiversity and biomass in the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot
    de Lima, Renato A. F.
    Oliveira, Alexandre A.
    Pitta, Gregory R.
    de Gasper, Andre L.
    Vibrans, Alexander C.
    Chave, Jerome
    ter Steege, Hans
    Prado, Paulo I.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [37] Preliminary Trend Analysis of International Wildlife Trade in Ghana in Relation to Global Zoonotic Disease Outbreaks
    Dakwa, Kwaku B.
    Bempah, Godfred
    Messenger, Kevin R.
    Nartey, Moses A.
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2024, : 983 - 993
  • [38] Evidence on the role of social media in the illegal trade of Iranian wildlife
    Sardari, Pourya
    Felfelian, Farshad
    Mohammadi, Alireza
    Nayeri, Danial
    Davis, Elizabeth O.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 4 (07)
  • [39] Empty forests: safeguarding a sinking flagship in a biodiversity hotspot
    Cuadros-Casanova, Ivon
    Zamora, Camilo
    Ulrich, Werner
    Seibold, Sebastian
    Habel, Jan C.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 27 (10) : 2495 - 2506
  • [40] Livelihood vulnerability and human-wildlife interactions across protected areas
    Pereira, Joana Gomes
    Rosalino, Luis Miguel
    Ekblom, Anneli
    Santos, Maria J.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 29 (01):