First Report: Linear Incision for Placement of a Magnetically Coupled Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant

被引:4
作者
Barry, Jonnae Y. [1 ]
Reghunathan, Saranya [1 ]
Jacob, Abraham [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 1501 N Campbell Ave,POB 245074, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
BAHA; bone anchored hearing implant; magnetically coupled device; osteointegrating device; SOFT-TISSUE REDUCTION; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; CONDUCTION HEARING; SURGERY; DEVICE; COMPLICATIONS; DERMATOME; PUNCH;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000001290
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Discuss use of a linear incision for placement of a magnetically coupled bone anchored hearing implant. Methods: Case series. Results: Two patients underwent placement of magnetically coupled bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHI) through linear incisions. The first, a 40-year-old female with congenital single-sided deafness, previously had successful implantation of a percutaneous bone anchored hearing implant through a linear incision; unfortunately, she developed pain and intermittent drainage at her abutment site with time, resulting in a request for removal of her device. As an alternative to complete removal, we offered to replace the percutaneous implant with a magnetically coupled BAHI, employing the same linear incision previously. The second patient, a 53-year-old obese female with limited neck mobility and mixed hearing loss, underwent primary placement of a magnetically coupled BAHI through a linear incision. Limitations in neck mobility and patient body habitus precluded use of a traditional C-shaped incision. Both patients underwent surgery successfully, healed without incident, had their devices activated 6 weeks after their procedures, and are able to wear their implants more than 8 hours per day without discomfort. Conclusion: Surgical techniques for bone-anchored implants continue to evolve. Though manufacturers of magnetically coupled devices recommend using C-shaped incisions with large skin flaps, our first reported cases suggest that a small linear incision immediately overlying the implant magnet may be an acceptable alternative. Potential benefits include a smaller incision, less hair removal, smaller flap, decreased surgical time, and less postoperative pain.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 224
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Bone-anchored hearing device surgery: Linear incision without soft tissue reduction. A prospective study [J].
Altun, Xabier ;
Jose Navarro, Juan ;
Palicio, Idoia ;
Alvarez, Leire .
ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA, 2015, 66 (05) :258-263
[2]  
Anstead G M, 1998, Adv Wound Care, V11, P277
[3]  
Briggs R, 2015, OTOL NEUROTOL, V36, P834, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000712
[4]  
Cochlear Americas, COCHL BAH 4 ATTR SYS
[5]   Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction [J].
Dumon, Thibaud ;
Medina, Marimar ;
Sperling, Neil M. .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 125 (03) :199-206
[6]   Bone conduction implants - a rapidly developing field [J].
Edmiston, R. C. ;
Aggarwal, R. ;
Green, K. M. J. .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2015, 129 (10) :936-940
[7]   Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants [J].
Esposito, Marco ;
Grusovin, Maria Gabriella ;
Maghaireh, Hassan ;
Worthington, Helen V. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (03)
[8]   Medicinal Honey as Treatment for Skin Reactions Associated With Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant Surgery [J].
Faucett, Erynne A. ;
Reghunathan, Saranya ;
Jacob, Abraham .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (07) :1720-1723
[9]   Minimally Invasive Surgery for Osseointegrated Auditory Implants: A Comparison of Linear versus Punch Techniques [J].
Gordon, Steven A. ;
Coelho, Daniel H. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 152 (06) :1089-1093
[10]  
Hogsbro M, 2015, OTOL NEUROTOL, V36, P805, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000731