Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard

被引:13
作者
Chellali, A. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, L. [3 ]
Sankaranarayanan, G. [4 ]
Arikatla, V. S. [4 ]
Ahn, W. [4 ]
Derevianko, A. [5 ]
Schwaitzberg, S. D. [1 ]
Jones, D. B. [6 ]
DeMoya, M. [5 ]
Cao, C. G. L. [7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Cambridge Hlth Alliance, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Evry, Dept Comp Engn, IBISC Lab, Evry, France
[3] Tufts Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[4] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Ctr Modeling Simulat & Imaging Med, Troy, NY USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[7] Wright State Univ, Dept Biomed Ind & Human Factors Engn, Russ Engn Ctr 207, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2014年 / 28卷 / 10期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Surgical training; Virtual reality (VR); Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer (VBLaST); Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Skills (FLS); Force feedback; VIRTUAL-REALITY; CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SKILLS; SIMULATOR; PERFORMANCE; PROGRAM; FACE; VALIDITY; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3538-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The FLS trainer lacks objective and automated assessments of laparoscopic performance and requires a large supply of relatively expensive consumables. Virtual reality simulation has a great potential as a training and assessment tool of laparoscopic skills and can overcome some limitations of the FLS trainer. This study was carried out to assess the value of our Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer (VBLaST(C)) in the peg transfer task compared to the FLS trainer and its ability to differentiate performance between novice, intermediate, and expert groups. Methods Thirty subjects were divided into three groups: novices (PGY1-2, n = 10), intermediates (PGY3-4, n = 10), and experts (PGY5, surgical fellows and attendings, n = 10). All subjects performed ten trials of the peg transfer task on each simulator. Assessment of laparoscopic performance was based on FLS scoring while a questionnaire was used for subjective evaluation. Results The performance scores in the two simulators were correlated, though subjects performed significantly better in the FLS trainer. Experts performed better than novices only on the FLS trainer while no significant differences were observed between the other groups. Moreover, a significant learning effect was found on both trainers, with a greater improvement of performance on the VBLaST(R). Finally, 82.6 % of the subjects preferred the FLS over the VBLaST(R) for surgical training which could be attributed to the novelty of the VR technology and existing deficiencies of the user interface for the VBLaST(R). Conclusion This study demonstrated that the VBLaST(R) reproduced faithfully some aspects of the FLS peg transfer task (such as color, size, and shape of the peg board, etc.) while other aspects require additional development. Future improvement of the user interface and haptic feedback will enhance the value of the system as an alternative to the FLS as the standard training tool for laparoscopic surgery skills.
引用
收藏
页码:2856 / 2862
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons [J].
Aggarwal, Rajesh ;
Grantcharov, Teodor P. ;
Eriksen, Jens R. ;
Blirup, Dorthe ;
Kristiansen, Viggo B. ;
Funch-Jensen, Peter ;
Darzi, Ara .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (02) :310-314
[2]  
[Anonymous], J SPORT EXERC PSYCHO
[3]   Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator [J].
Arikatla, Venkata S. ;
Sankaranarayanan, Ganesh ;
Ahn, Woojin ;
Chellali, Amine ;
De, Suvranu ;
Caroline, G. L. ;
Hwabejire, John ;
DeMoya, Marc ;
Schwaitzberg, Steven ;
Jones, Daniel B. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (05) :1721-1729
[4]   Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: What is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator [J].
Botden, Sanne M. B. I. ;
Buzink, Sonja N. ;
Schijven, Marlies P. ;
Jakimowicz, Jack J. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (04) :764-772
[5]  
Cao C., 1996, P ASME DYN SYST CONT
[6]  
Cao C, 1997, J SPORT EXERCISE PSY, V19
[7]   Haptic Communication to Support Biopsy Procedures Learning in Virtual Environments [J].
Chellali, Amine ;
Dumas, Cedric ;
Milleville-Pennel, Isabelle .
PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY, 2012, 21 (04) :470-489
[8]  
Dang T, 2001, ST HEAL T, V81, P97
[9]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191
[10]  
Fraser SA, 2003, SURG ENDOSC, V17, P964, DOI 10.1007/s00464-002-8828-4