The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulation on the energy eco-efficiency of China's energy-mineral cities

被引:88
作者
Cui, Shengnan [1 ]
Wang, Yanqiu [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Zhiwei [2 ]
Zhu, Zhihong [1 ]
Yu, Congyang [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Petr Univ Daqing, Sch Econ & Management, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Louisiana, Dept Management, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Management, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Environmental regulation; Energy eco-efficiency; Energy -mineral city; Tobit model; Threshold effect;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131553
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The improvement of energy eco-efficiency (EEE) is the key to achieving coordinated and sustainable develop-ment of China's energy economy and environmental protection. Under ecological constraints, effective envi-ronmental regulations have become an important method to promote Pareto optimization of energy resources. Based on the panel data of China's 31 energy-mineral cities in 2007-2018, the energy eco-efficiency is evaluated, Tobit regression and threshold regression models are constructed to test the effects of heterogeneous environ-mental regulations on energy eco-efficiency. The results show that: Energy eco-efficiency increased from 0.333 to 0.678 in 2007-2008, and the growth of energy eco-efficiency is the most significant in eastern China; compulsory environmental regulations (CER) and market-incentive environmental regulations (MER) will inhibit energy eco-efficiency, and the inhibitory effect is more obvious in central and northeastern regions; voluntary environmental regulations (VER) have a time lag in inhibiting energy eco-efficiency. There is a single threshold for the impact of compulsory and market-incentive environmental regulations on energy eco-efficiency. Voluntary environmental regulations have the double threshold, and they can promote energy eco-efficiency only within the threshold range. These findings indicate that the effects of different environmental regulations on EEE differ by region and have different thresholds. Therefore, the environmental regulation tools are improved by enhancing the envi-ronmental information disclosure mechanism, the eco-welfare-oriented appraisal mechanism and the system of rewards and punishments for technological innovation. Furthermore, multiple environmental regulation tools can be flexibly adjusted to effectively improve EEE based on the characteristics and realities of different regions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   A PROCEDURE FOR RANKING EFFICIENT UNITS IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSEN, P ;
PETERSEN, NC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1261-1265
[2]  
Bao J., 2022, ARID ZONE RESOURCES, V36, P25, DOI DOI 10.13448/J.CNKI.JALRE.2022.031
[3]   Linking environmental regulation and economic growth through technological innovation and resource consumption: Analysis of spatial interaction patterns of urban agglomerations [J].
Cao, Yu ;
Wan, Ningna ;
Zhang, Haiyong ;
Zhang, Xiaoling ;
Zhou, Qian .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 112
[4]   Does environmental regulation indirectly induce upstream innovation? New evidence from India [J].
Chakraborty, Pavel ;
Chatterjee, Chirantan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (05) :939-955
[5]  
Chen Z., 2019, CHINA IND EC, V12, P8, DOI [10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2019.12.005, DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2019.12.005]
[6]  
Dai J., 2020, AGR RESOUR REGIONALI, V41, P55
[7]  
Diao X.W., 2020, TECHNOL EC MANAG RES, V3, P92
[8]  
Gong Y.Y., 2018, Urban Probl, V8, P68, DOI DOI 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.180808
[9]  
[关伟 Guan Wei], 2015, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V70, P980
[10]  
[何爱平 He Aiping], 2019, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V29, P21