Cities are hotspots for threatened species

被引:521
作者
Ives, Christopher D. [1 ]
Lentini, Pia E. [2 ]
Threlfall, Caragh G. [3 ]
Ikin, Karen [4 ]
Shanahan, Danielle F. [5 ]
Garrard, Georgia E. [1 ]
Bekessy, Sarah A. [1 ]
Fuller, Richard A. [5 ]
Mumaw, Laura [1 ]
Rayner, Laura [4 ]
Rowe, Ross [4 ,6 ,7 ]
Valentine, Leonie E. [8 ]
Kendal, Dave [9 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Biosci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Sch Ecosyst & Forest Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Australian Govt, Dept Environm, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[7] Univ Tasmania, Natl Environm Res Program, Landscapes & Policy Res Hub, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[8] Univ Western Australia, Sch Plant Biol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[9] Australian Res Ctr Urban Ecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 2016年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Australia; biodiversity; conservation policy; species distributions; threatened species; urbanization; PTEROPUS-POLIOCEPHALUS; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; URBANIZATION; EXPANSION; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1111/geb.12404
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim Although urbanization impacts many species, there is little information on the patterns of occurrences of threatened species in urban relative to non-urban areas. By assessing the extent of the distribution of threatened species across all Australian cities, we aim to investigate the currently under-utilized opportunity that cities present for national biodiversity conservation. Location Australian mainland, Tasmania and offshore islands. Methods Distributions of Australia's 1643 legally protected terrestrial species (hereafter 'threatened species') were compiled. We assessed the extent to which they overlapped with 99 cities (of more than 10,000 people), with all non-urban areas, and with simulated 'dummy' cities which covered the same area and bioregion as the true cities but were non-urban. We analysed differences between animals and plants, and examined variability within these groups using species accumulation modelling. Threatened species richness of true versus dummy cities was analysed using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Results Australian cities support substantially more nationally threatened animal and plant species than all other non-urban areas on a unit-area basis. Thirty per cent of threatened species were found to occur in cities. Distribution patterns differed between plants and animals: individual threatened plant species were generally found in fewer cities than threatened animal species, yet plants were more likely to have a greater proportion of their distribution in urban areas than animals. Individual cities tended to contain unique suites of threatened species, especially threatened plants. The analysis of true versus dummy cities demonstrated that, even after accounting for factors such as net primary productivity and distance to the coast, cities still consistently supported a greater number of threatened species. Main conclusions This research highlights that Australian cities are important for the conservation of threatened species, and that the species assemblages of individual cities are relatively distinct. National conservation policy should recognize that cities play an integral role when planning for and managing threatened species.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 126
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function [J].
Alberti, M .
INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2005, 28 (02) :168-192
[2]  
[Anonymous], SWIFT PARR LATH DISC
[3]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN SETTLEMENTS TH
[4]  
[Anonymous], SPEC NAT ENV SIGN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, AUSTR STAT GEOGR STA
[6]  
[Anonymous], NET PRIM PROD 1 MONT
[7]   A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers [J].
Aronson, Myla F. J. ;
La Sorte, Frank A. ;
Nilon, Charles H. ;
Katti, Madhusudan ;
Goddard, Mark A. ;
Lepczyk, Christopher A. ;
Warren, Paige S. ;
Williams, Nicholas S. G. ;
Cilliers, Sarel ;
Clarkson, Bruce ;
Dobbs, Cynnamon ;
Dolan, Rebecca ;
Hedblom, Marcus ;
Klotz, Stefan ;
Kooijmans, Jip Louwe ;
Kuehn, Ingolf ;
MacGregor-Fors, Ian ;
McDonnell, Mark ;
Mortberg, Ulla ;
Pysek, Petr ;
Siebert, Stefan ;
Sushinsky, Jessica ;
Werner, Peter ;
Winter, Marten .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1780)
[8]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011, Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 1-Main Structure and Greater Capital City Statistical Areas
[9]   Transparent planning for biodiversity and development in the urban fringe [J].
Bekessy, Sarah Adine ;
White, Matt ;
Gordon, Ascelin ;
Moilanen, Atte ;
Mccarthy, Michael Andrew ;
Wintle, Brendan Anthony .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 108 (2-4) :140-149
[10]   Beyond prejudice: Conservation in the City. A case study from Switzerland [J].
Cavin, Joelle Salomon .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 166 :84-89