Coalitions of Arguments: A Tool for Handling Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

被引：45

作者：

Cayrol, Claudette ^{[1
]}

Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Toulouse 3, IRIT, UPS, F-31062 Toulouse 09, France

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS | 2010年 / 25卷 / 01期

关键词：

LOGIC; ACCEPTABILITY;

D O I：

10.1002/int.20389

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

Bipolar argumentation frameworks enable to represent two kinds of interaction between arguments: support and conflict. In this paper, we turn a bipolar argumentation framework into a meta-argumentation framework where conflicts occur between sets of arguments, characterized as coalitions of supporting arguments. So, Dung's well-known semantics can be used on this meta-argumentation framework to select the acceptable arguments. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

引用

页码：83 / 109

页数：27

共 19 条

[1]

Amgoud L, 2000, FRONT ARTIF INTEL AP, V54, P338

[2]

AMGOUD L, 2004, P 10 INT WORKSH NONM, P1

[3]

Amgoud L., 2005, P 4 INT JOINT C AUT, P1185, DOI [10.1145/1082473.1082685, DOI 10.1145/1082473.1082685]

[4] Collective argumentation and disjunctive logic programming [J].

Bochman, A .

JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2003, 13 (03) :405-428

[5]

Cayrol C, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3571, P378

[6]

Cayrol C, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3571, P366

[7]

Claude B, 1973, Graphs and hypergraphs

[8]

DANG VD, 2004, P 3 INT JOINT C AUT, P564

[9]

DOUTRE S, 2001, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V2083, P272

[10] ON THE ACCEPTABILITY OF ARGUMENTS AND ITS FUNDAMENTAL ROLE IN NONMONOTONIC REASONING, LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND N-PERSON GAMES [J].

DUNG, PM .

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 77 (02) :321-357

← 1 2 →