Effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition with variants of a multichannel adaptive dynamic range compression scheme

被引:10
作者
Rallapalli, Varsha H. [1 ,2 ]
Alexander, Joshua M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
Hearing aids; speech perception; adaptive compression; multichannel; RELEASE TIME; HEARING-AIDS; AMPLITUDE-COMPRESSION; INTELLIGIBILITY; PERCEPTION; LISTENERS; RATIOS; NUMBER; IDENTIFICATION; AMPLIFICATION;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2019.1617902
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Adaptive compression methods in hearing aids have been developed to maximise audibility while preserving temporal envelope modulations. Increasing the number of channels may improve listening comfort for loud sounds. However, the effects of this on speech recognition in different environmental conditions are unknown. This study evaluated the effects of different channel architectures and adaptive compression properties on speech recognition in noise and reverberation. Design: Sentences were mixed with steady or modulated noise at three signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). These were processed with and without reverberation and amplified with four proprietary adaptive compression methods or linear amplification. Study sample: 36 listeners with mild to moderately-severe hearing loss. Results: Adaptive compression improved speech recognition over linear amplification to a small extent, with no significant differences among methods using 4 or 24 channels or a combination thereof. These effects remained across the different background noise and reverberation conditions. Conclusions: Increasing the number of channels does not negatively affect speech recognition in noise and reverberation when adaptive compression is used. If future research shows that increasing the number of channels improves listening comfort for loud sounds, these results indicate that adaptive compression methods with as many as 24 channels are viable options for hearing aids.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 669
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]  
Ellison John C, 2003, J Am Acad Audiol, V14, P59, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.14.2.2
[12]   Evaluation of spectral enhancement in hearing aids, combined with phonemic compression [J].
Franck, BAM ;
van Kreveld-Bos, CSGM ;
Dreschler, WA ;
Verschuure, H .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 106 (03) :1452-1464
[13]   Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings - 1. Patterns of benefit [J].
Gatehouse, S ;
Naylor, G ;
Elberling, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2006, 45 (03) :130-152
[14]  
Gatehouse Stuart, 2003, Int J Audiol, V42 Suppl 1, pS77, DOI 10.3109/14992020309074648
[15]   The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility [J].
George, Erwin L. J. ;
Festen, Joost M. ;
Houtgast, Tammo .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 124 (02) :1269-1277
[16]   Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility [J].
Jenstad, LM ;
Souza, PE .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2005, 48 (03) :651-667
[17]   Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: Aided speech perception measures [J].
Jenstad, LM ;
Seewald, RC ;
Cornelisse, LE ;
Shantz, J .
EAR AND HEARING, 1999, 20 (02) :117-126
[18]   Understanding compression: Modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids [J].
Kates, James M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2010, 49 (06) :395-409
[19]  
Kuk F., 2018, HEARING REV, V25, P24
[20]  
Moore B C, 1991, Br J Audiol, V25, P171, DOI 10.3109/03005369109079851