Effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition with variants of a multichannel adaptive dynamic range compression scheme

被引:10
作者
Rallapalli, Varsha H. [1 ,2 ]
Alexander, Joshua M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
Hearing aids; speech perception; adaptive compression; multichannel; RELEASE TIME; HEARING-AIDS; AMPLITUDE-COMPRESSION; INTELLIGIBILITY; PERCEPTION; LISTENERS; RATIOS; NUMBER; IDENTIFICATION; AMPLIFICATION;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2019.1617902
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Adaptive compression methods in hearing aids have been developed to maximise audibility while preserving temporal envelope modulations. Increasing the number of channels may improve listening comfort for loud sounds. However, the effects of this on speech recognition in different environmental conditions are unknown. This study evaluated the effects of different channel architectures and adaptive compression properties on speech recognition in noise and reverberation. Design: Sentences were mixed with steady or modulated noise at three signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). These were processed with and without reverberation and amplified with four proprietary adaptive compression methods or linear amplification. Study sample: 36 listeners with mild to moderately-severe hearing loss. Results: Adaptive compression improved speech recognition over linear amplification to a small extent, with no significant differences among methods using 4 or 24 channels or a combination thereof. These effects remained across the different background noise and reverberation conditions. Conclusions: Increasing the number of channels does not negatively affect speech recognition in noise and reverberation when adaptive compression is used. If future research shows that increasing the number of channels improves listening comfort for loud sounds, these results indicate that adaptive compression methods with as many as 24 channels are viable options for hearing aids.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 669
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech [J].
Alexander, Joshua M. ;
Rallapalli, Varsha .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2017, 142 (02) :908-923
[2]   Effects of WDRC Release Time and Number of Channels on Output SNR and Speech Recognition [J].
Alexander, Joshua M. ;
Masterson, Katie .
EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (02) :E35-E49
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1969, IEEE T ACOUST SPEECH, VAU17, P225
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HEARING AIDS
[5]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[6]   Multichannel Compression: Effects of Reduced Spectral Contrast on Vowel Identification [J].
Bor, Stephanie ;
Souza, Pamela ;
Wright, Richard .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 51 (05) :1315-1327
[7]   AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM AVERAGE SPEECH SPECTRA [J].
BYRNE, D ;
DILLON, H ;
TRAN, K ;
ARLINGER, S ;
WILBRAHAM, K ;
COX, R ;
HAGERMAN, B ;
HETU, R ;
KEI, J ;
LUI, C ;
KIESSLING, J ;
KOTBY, MN ;
NASSER, NHA ;
ELKHOLY, WAH ;
NAKANISHI, Y ;
OYER, H ;
POWELL, R ;
STEPHENS, D ;
MEREDITH, R ;
SIRIMANNA, T ;
TAVARTKILADZE, G ;
FROLENKOV, GI ;
WESTERMAN, S ;
LUDVIGSEN, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 96 (04) :2108-2120
[8]   Effects of Audibility and Multichannel Wide Dynamic Range Compression on Consonant Recognition for Listeners with Severe Hearing Loss [J].
Davies-Venn, Evelyn ;
Souza, Pamela ;
Brennan, Marc ;
Stecker, G. Christopher .
EAR AND HEARING, 2009, 30 (05) :494-504
[9]  
Dreschler WA, 2001, AUDIOLOGY, V40, P148
[10]   EFFECT OF REVERBERATION AND NOISE ON THE INTELLIGIBILITY OF SENTENCES IN CASES OF PRESBYACUSIS [J].
DUQUESNOY, AJ ;
PLOMP, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1980, 68 (02) :537-544