Integrated flood vulnerability assessment approach based on TOPSIS and Shannon entropy methods

被引:162
作者
Yang, Weichao [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Kui [1 ,2 ]
Lian, Jijian [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Bin, Lingling [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Simulat & Safety, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Frontier Technol Res Inst, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flood vulnerability; Integrated assessment; TOPSIS; Shannon entropy method; Hydrodynamic model; Multi-indices system; Inhomogeneity; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; FLASH-FLOOD; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RISK; PERFORMANCE; LESSONS; HAZARDS; IMPACT; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.015
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Flood vulnerability assessment is becoming increasingly important around the world. Nevertheless, the high dimensional and non-linear relationship between various indices and flood vulnerability greatly hinders researchers from making a reasonable assessment. Thus, an integrated flood vulnerability assessment approach is proposed here by combining a multi-criteria decision making technique, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), with the Shannon entropy method. The Shannon entropy method is used to account for the inhomogeneity in the indicator values. TOPSIS uses a multi-criteria system where hydrodynamic modeling is applied to obtain the values of exposure indicators. This approach is tested in a rural district of Hainan Province, China. The flood vulnerability at the town and administrative village scales is presented through a geographic information system. By considering the inhomogeneity of the internal attributes, the integrated assessment approach is eventually proven as a highly realistic approach for assessing flood vulnerability. The advantages of this approach become highly pronounced when the evaluation objects have more internal indicators and the internal inhomogeneity among the values of these indicators is high. The main driving factors of flood vulnerability in one district has also been successfully identified using the proposed integrated method. In sum, this integrated assessment method can provide decision makers with highly targeted decision making references to effectively reduce the flood vulnerability of the study area.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 280
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[2]  
Adler M., 1996, Gazing Into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health
[3]   The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation [J].
Brooks, N ;
Adger, WN ;
Kelly, PM .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2005, 15 (02) :151-163
[4]   Preparedness and storm hazards in a global warming world: lessons from Southeast Asia [J].
Chang, Chew-Hung .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2011, 56 (03) :667-679
[5]   Assessing urban flooding vulnerability with an emergy approach [J].
Chang, Li-Fang ;
Huang, Shu-Li .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2015, 143 :11-24
[6]   Multicriteria decision making based on the TOPSIS method and similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy values [J].
Chen, Shyi-Ming ;
Cheng, Shou-Hsiung ;
Lan, Tzu-Chun .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 367 :279-295
[7]   Multi-Criteria Assessment of Spatial Robust Water Resource Vulnerability Using the TOPSIS Method Coupled with Objective and Subjective Weights in the Han River Basin [J].
Chung, Eun-Sung ;
Abdulai, Patricia Jitta ;
Park, Hyesun ;
Kim, Yeonjoo ;
Ahn, So Ra ;
Kim, Seong Joon .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (01)
[8]   Social vulnerability to environmental hazards [J].
Cutter, SL ;
Boruff, BJ ;
Shirley, WL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 84 (02) :242-261
[9]   Performance -emission optimization of a diesel-hydrogen dual fuel operation: A NSGA II coupled TOPSIS MADM approach [J].
Deb, Madhujit ;
Debbarma, Bishop ;
Majumder, Arindam ;
Banerjee, Rahul .
ENERGY, 2016, 117 :281-290
[10]  
Doocy Shannon, 2013, PLoS Curr, V5, DOI [10.1371/currents.dis.f4deb457904936b07c09daa98ee8171a, 10.1371/currents.dis.67bd14fe457f1db0b5433a8ee20fb833]