Validation of an established prognostic score after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma

被引:36
作者
Kessel, Kerstin A. [1 ,2 ]
Hesse, Josefine [1 ]
Straube, Christoph [1 ]
Zimmer, Claus [3 ]
Schmidt-Graf, Friederike [4 ]
Schlegel, Juergen [5 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [6 ]
Combs, Stephanie E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, Inst Innovat Radiotherapy iRT, Dept Radiat Oncol, Neuherberg, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neuroradiol, Munich, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neurol, Munich, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neuropathol, Munich, Germany
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neurosurg, Munich, Germany
关键词
MALIGNANT GLIOMA; PATIENT COHORT; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2016.1276621
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Re-irradiation (Re-RT) is offered widely in clinical routine, and has been established as a key element in the treatment of recurrent gliomas. At our center, generally re-resection is performed widely by an experienced neurosurgical team. Thus, Re-RT mostly offered to patients with macroscopic residuals or irresectable lesions, is applied later compared to other centers. Therefore, we sought to validate the Combs Prognostic Score developed in 2012 using our independent patient cohort. Patients and methods: We included 199 patients treated from 2002 until April 2016 for recurrent glioma at the Department of Radiation Oncology at the Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich. Different concepts of Re-RT were applied. Results: Median follow-up after Re-RT was 2.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) after Re-RT was 7.9 months for WHO IV gliomas, 11.3 months for WHO III gliomas, and 13.6 months for low-grade gliomas (WHO I/II). Univariate analyses confirmed the prognostic factors primary histology (p=0.001), age (p = 0.002), and time between primary radiotherapy and Re-RT (p<0.001). We also tested Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), gender, and neurological symptoms before Re-RT as well as planning target volume and found only KPS also significant at p<0.001. Comparing the prognostic score groups, the outcome was highly statistically significant at p<0.001. Conclusion: In our analysis, we validated the Combs Prognostic Score. Validation in this independent large patient cohort confirms the significance of the score for glioma recurrences. Thus, the role of the Combs Prognostic Score might be an essential component of future clinical decision making and patient stratification.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 426
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Amichetti Maurizio, 2011, Cancers (Basel), V3, P4061, DOI 10.3390/cancers3044061
[2]  
Combs SE, 2006, CHIRURG, V77, P1126, DOI 10.1007/s00104-006-1268-2
[3]   Efficacy of fractionated stereotactic reirradiation in recurrent gliomas: Long-term results in 172 patients treated in a single institution [J].
Combs, SE ;
Thilmann, C ;
Edler, L ;
Debus, J ;
Schulz-Ertner, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (34) :8863-8869
[4]   Generation and validation of a prognostic score to predict outcome after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma [J].
Combs, Stephanie E. ;
Edler, Lutz ;
Rausch, Renate ;
Welzel, Thomas ;
Wick, Wolfgang ;
Debus, Juergen .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (01) :147-152
[5]   Radiotherapeutic alternatives for previously irradiated recurrent gliomas [J].
Combs, Stephanie E. ;
Debus, Juergen ;
Schulz-Ertner, Daniela .
BMC CANCER, 2007, 7 (1)
[6]  
Dhermain F, 2004, B CANCER, V91, P883
[7]   Five-year experience with setup and implementation of an integrated database system for clinical documentation and research [J].
Kessel, Kerstin A. ;
Bohn, Christian ;
Engelmann, Uwe ;
Oetzel, Dieter ;
Bougatf, Nina ;
Bendl, Rolf ;
Debusa, Juergen ;
Combsa, Stephanie E. .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2014, 114 (02) :206-217
[8]   Validation of the prognostic Heidelberg re-irradiation score in an independent mono-institutional patient cohort [J].
Niyazi, Maximilian ;
Flieger, Maya ;
Ganswindt, Ute ;
Combs, Stephanie E. ;
Belka, Claus .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
[9]   Re-resection for recurrent high-grade glioma in the setting of re-irradiation: more is not always better [J].
Palmer, Joshua D. ;
Siglin, Joshua ;
Yamoah, Kosj ;
Dan, Tu ;
Champ, Colin E. ;
Bar-Ad, Voichita ;
Werner-Wasik, Maria ;
Evans, James J. ;
Kim, Lyndon ;
Glass, Jon ;
Farrell, Christopher ;
Andrews, David W. ;
Shi, Wenyin .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 124 (02) :215-221
[10]   RETRACTED: Recurrent Glioblastoma: Where we stand(Retracted article. See vol. 6, pg. 153, 2017) [J].
Roy, Sanjoy ;
Lahiri, Debarshi ;
Maji, Tapas ;
Biswas, Jaydip .
SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 4 (04) :163-173