Safety and efficacy of basic fibroblast growth factors for deep second-degree burn patients

被引:5
作者
Ahn, Hye-na [1 ]
Kang, Hee-sung [1 ]
Park, Su-jung [1 ]
Park, Mi-hee [1 ]
Chun, Wook [2 ]
Cho, Eun [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Daewoong Pharmaceut Co HQ, Seoul 06170, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Hangang Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Burn Surg, Med Ctr,Burn Ctr, Seoul 07247, South Korea
[3] Sookmyung Womens Univ, Coll Pharm, Cheongpa Ro 47 Gil 100, Seoul 04310, South Korea
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Pharm, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Basic fibroblast growth factor; Second-degree burn; Post-marketing surveillance; Regenerative medicine; Adverse event; CULTURED SKIN SUBSTITUTES; DERMAL FIBROBLASTS; KERATINOCYTES; SCARS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2020.06.019
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Burn injuries are common afflictions; however, conservative wound care frequently leads to poor treatment compliance and physical disability in deep burn patients. Therefore, regenerative biologic materials, which are more effective for tissue repair, are required, particularly for deep second-degree burns. A novel spray formulation of basic fibroblast growth factors (bFGF) was produced by synthesizing fibroblast growth factor proteins. In this post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of bFGF and indirectly compared this formulation with cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs) for treating deep second-degree burns. Materials and methods: A total of 3173 patients treated at 15 hospitals were used for PMS of bFGF in South Korea for six years. In total, 1630 patients with deep second-degree burns were selected for assessing adverse events (AEs) of bFGF treatments. Efficacy was evaluated according to time periods until re-epithelialization, and clinical usefulness of bFGF was indirectly compared with that of CEAs. Results: AEs occurred in 37 patients (2.3%) and included application site pain (1.7%) and contact dermatitis (0.6%). All AEs were mild and were evaluated as probably unrelated with bFGF. The average time for re-epithelialization was 8 days; this time span was significantly longer after major burns (9.7 days) than after minor (7.8 days) or moderate burns (7.9 days). Most treated burn wounds (99.8%) were assessed as improved. The indirect comparison included 534 patients using the same inclusion criteria for CEA patients (n = 35). The bFGF treatment demonstrated superior efficacy compared to CEAs by significantly reducing the average day to application (5.4 vs. 8.8 days) and re-epithelialization time (7.1 vs. 13.7 days). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that bFGF is a compelling regenerative therapy with competitive clinical efficacy and safety for deep second-degree burns and reduced treatment time, which is expected to reduce medical costs, particularly for deep second-degree burn patients. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1857 / 1866
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] A basic fibroblast growth factor improved the quality of skin grafting in burn patients
    Akita, S
    Akino, K
    Imaizumi, T
    Hirano, A
    [J]. BURNS, 2005, 31 (07) : 855 - 858
  • [2] Basic fibroblast growth factor accelerates and improves second-degree burn wound healing
    Akita, Sadanori
    Akino, Kozo
    Imaizumi, Toshifumi
    Hirano, Akiyoshi
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2008, 16 (05) : 635 - 641
  • [3] American College of Surgeons. Committee on Trauma, 1998, COMMITTEE TRAUMA RES
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1990, J Burn Care Rehabil, V11, P98
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, MFDS LINE LIB SYSTEM
  • [6] Cultured skin substitutes reduce donor skin harvesting for closure of excised, full-thickness burns
    Boyce, ST
    Kagan, RJ
    Yakuboff, KP
    Meyer, NA
    Rieman, MT
    Greenhalgh, DG
    Warden, GD
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (02) : 269 - 279
  • [7] COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF CULTURED SKIN SUBSTITUTES AND NATIVE SKIN AUTOGRAFT FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS BURNS
    BOYCE, ST
    GORETSKY, MJ
    GREENHALGH, DG
    KAGAN, RJ
    RIEMAN, MT
    WARDEN, GD
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (06) : 743 - 752
  • [8] Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools
    Brusselaers, Nele
    Pirayesh, Ali
    Hoeksema, Henk
    Verbelen, Jozef
    Blot, Stijn
    Monstrey, Stan
    [J]. BURNS, 2010, 36 (08) : 1157 - 1164
  • [9] Cho K, 2009, JKOREANBURNSOC, V12, p115 ~20
  • [10] Choi JY, 2018, J KOREAN BURN SOC, V21, P55