MRA Versus DSA for Follow-Up of Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis

被引:72
作者
van Amerongen, M. J. [1 ]
Boogaarts, H. D. [1 ]
de Vries, J. [1 ]
Verbeek, A. L. M. [2 ]
Meijer, F. J. A. [3 ]
Prokop, M. [3 ]
Bartels, R. H. M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Neurosurg, Med Ctr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Med Ctr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol Neuroradiol, Med Ctr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
TIME-OF-FLIGHT; GUGLIELMI DETACHABLE COILS; DIGITAL-SUBTRACTION-ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRA; ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT; CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; SACCULAR ANEURYSMS; UNRUPTURED ANEURYSMS;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A3700
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
MR angiography is proposed as a safer and less expensive alternative to the reference standard, DSA, in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coil occlusion. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of TOF-MRA and contrast-enhanced MRA in detecting residual flow in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. Literature was reviewed through the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE data bases. In comparison with DSA, the sensitivity of TOF-MRA was 86% (95% CI: 82-89%), with a specificity of 84% (95% CI: 81-88%), for the detection of any recurrent flow. For contrast-enhanced MRA, the sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI: 82-89%) and 89% (95% CI: 85-92%), respectively. Both TOF-MRA and contrast-enhanced MRA are shown to be highly accurate for detection of any recanalization in intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coil occlusion.
引用
收藏
页码:1655 / 1661
页数:7
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography [J].
Agid, R. ;
Willinsky, R. A. ;
Lee, S. -K. ;
TerBrugge, K. G. ;
Farb, R. I. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2008, 29 (08) :1570-1574
[2]   Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries [J].
Al-Kwifi, O ;
Emery, DJ ;
Wilman, AH .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 20 (02) :181-187
[3]  
Anzalone N, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P746
[4]   Feasibility of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) follow-up as the primary imaging modality after coiling of intracranial aneurysms [J].
Bakker, Nicolaas A. ;
Westerlaan, Henriette E. ;
Metzemaekers, Jan D. M. ;
van Dijk, J. Marc C. ;
Eshghi, Omid S. ;
Mooij, Jan Jakob A. ;
Groen, Rob J. M. .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (02) :226-232
[5]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[6]   Impact of Patient Selection in Various Study Designs: Identifying Potential Bias in Clinical Results [J].
Berbano, Elizabeth P. ;
Baxi, Nancy .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 105 (03) :149-155
[7]  
Bernstein MA, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V46, P955, DOI 10.1002/mrm.1282
[8]   Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography [J].
Boulin, A ;
Pierot, L .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (01) :108-113
[9]   STATISTICAL-METHODS FOR ASSESSING OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN CLINICAL MEASURES [J].
BRENNAN, P ;
SILMAN, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6840) :1491-1494
[10]   Prospective evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial saccular aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils [J].
Brunereau, L ;
Cottier, JP ;
Sonier, CB ;
Medioni, B ;
Bertrand, P ;
Rouleau, P ;
Sirinelli, D ;
Herbreteau, D .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (02) :216-223