Ion transport resistance in Microbial Electrolysis Cells with anion and cation exchange membranes

被引:211
作者
Sleutels, Tom H. J. A. [1 ,2 ]
Hamelers, Hubertus V. M. [1 ]
Rozendal, Rene A. [3 ]
Buisman, Cees J. N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Sub Dept Environm Technol, NL-6700 EV Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Excellence Sustainable Water Technol, NL-8900 CC Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Queensland, AWMC, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
MEC; Ion exchange membrane; MFC; Internal resistance; Hydrogen; FUEL-CELLS; WASTE-WATER; BIOCATALYZED ELECTROLYSIS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; POWER-GENERATION; BIOHYDROGEN PRODUCTION; PERFORMANCE; ACETATE; ELECTRICITY; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.004
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Previous studies have shown that Microbial Electrolysis Cells (MECs) perform better when an anion exchange membrane (AEM) than when a cation exchange membrane (CEM) separates the electrode chambers. Here, we have further studied this phenomenon by comparing two analysis methods for bio-electrochemical systems, based on potential losses and partial system resistances. Our study reconfirmed the large difference in performance between the AEM configuration (2.1 m(3) H-2 m(-3) d(-1)) and CEM configuration (0.4 m(3) H-2 m(-3) d(-1)) at I V. This better performance was caused mainly by the much lower internal resistance of the AEM configuration (192 m Omega m(2)) compared to the CEM configuration (435 m Omega m(2)). This lower internal resistance could be attributed to the lower transport resistance of ions through the AEM compared to the CEM caused by the properties of both membranes. By analyzing the changes in resistances the limitations in an MEC can be identified which can lead to improved cell design and higher hydrogen production rates. (C) 2009 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3612 / 3620
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Production of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater [J].
Angenent, LT ;
Karim, K ;
Al-Dahhan, MH ;
Domíguez-Espinosa, R .
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 22 (09) :477-485
[2]  
Bard A.J., 2001, ELECTROCHEMICAL METH
[3]   Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes [J].
Bond, DR ;
Lovley, DR .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 69 (03) :1548-1555
[4]   Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell lacking a membrane [J].
Call, Douglas ;
Logan, Bruce E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (09) :3401-3406
[5]   Biohydrogen production via biocatalyzed electrolysis in acetate-fed bioelectrochemical cells and microbial community analysis [J].
Chae, Kyu-Jung ;
Choi, Mi-Jin ;
Lee, Jinwook ;
Ajayi, F. F. ;
Kim, In S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2008, 33 (19) :5184-5192
[6]  
Cheng S, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P18871, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0706379104
[7]   Minimizing losses in bio-electrochemical systems: the road to applications [J].
Clauwaert, Peter ;
Aelterman, Peter ;
Pham, The Hai ;
De Schamphelaire, Liesje ;
Carballa, Marta ;
Rabaey, Korneel ;
Verstraete, Willy .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 79 (06) :901-913
[8]   Production of hydrogen from domestic wastewater using a bioelectrochemically assisted microbial reactor (BEAMR) [J].
Ditzig, Jenna ;
Liu, Hong ;
Logan, Bruce E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (13) :2296-2304
[9]   Current status of ion exchange membranes for power generation from salinity gradients [J].
Dlugolecki, Piotr ;
Nymeijer, Kitty ;
Metz, Sybrand ;
Wessling, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (1-2) :214-222
[10]  
ElDeab MS, 1996, J APPL ELECTROCHEM, V26, P1133, DOI 10.1007/BF00243738