Effect of open access scheduling on missed appointments, immunizations, and continuity of care for infant well-child care visits

被引:38
作者
O'Connor, Mary E.
Matthews, Bethany S.
Gao, Dexiang
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Denver Hlth, Denver, CO USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Denver, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Denver, CO USA
[4] Childrens Hosp, Res Inst, Denver, CO 80218 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE | 2006年 / 160卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.160.9.889
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the effect of open access scheduling (OA) on infant well-child care (WCC). Design: Cluster randomization of 2 methods of OA compared with a baseline group (prior to OA). Setting: Community health center pediatric clinic, August 1, 2003, to January 31, 2004. Participants: Ten providers (pediatricians and physician assistants) and 878 infants; 2-,4-, and 6-month WCC visits were scheduled. Interventions: Two scheduling methods were compared under the OA model: the OA future visit group scheduled their infant's next WCC visit when leaving the visit, and the OA same day group called for a same-day appointment. Main Outcome Measures: Missed appointment rates, on-time immunization rates, and continuity of care. Results: Missed appointment rates decreased from 21% in the baseline group to 14% and 9% in the OA future visit and OA same day groups, respectively (P <.02). For 630 infants older than 5 months at study end, on-time immunization rates were 59% in the baseline group and 74% in both OA groups (P <.006). Of 412 infants with 2 or more WCC visits, 75% in the OA future visit group and 60% in the OA same day group saw the same provider for all visits (P=.001). This difference was due to differences among providers, not to the different scheduling methods. Conclusion: Open access scheduling decreases missed appointments for infant WCC visits and appears to increase on-time immunizations.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 893
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Maternal acculturation and childhood immunization levels among children in Latino families in Los Angeles [J].
Anderson, LM ;
Wood, DL ;
Sherbourne, CD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (12) :2018-2021
[2]  
Anonymous, 2005, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V54, P717
[3]  
Belardi FG, 2004, FAM MED, V36, P341
[4]   Open access in primary care: Results of a North Carolina Pilot Project [J].
Bundy, DG ;
Randolph, GD ;
Murray, M ;
Anderson, J ;
Margolis, PA .
PEDIATRICS, 2005, 116 (01) :82-87
[5]  
Hixon A L, 1999, Fam Med, V31, P627
[6]  
Holl JL, 2000, PEDIATRICS, V105, P711
[7]  
Irigoyen MM, 2000, PEDIATRICS, V106, P919
[8]   The regional immunization registry as a public health tool for improving clinical practice and guiding immunization delivery policy [J].
Kempe, A ;
Beaty, BL ;
Steiner, JF ;
Pearson, KA ;
Lowery, NE ;
Daley, MF ;
Crane, LA ;
Berman, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (06) :967-972
[9]  
Lamberth EF, 2002, ARCH PEDIAT ADOL MED, V156, P86
[10]   WHAT MOTHERS SAY ABOUT WHY POOR CHILDREN FALL BEHIND ON IMMUNIZATIONS - A SUMMARY OF FOCUS GROUPS IN NORTH-CAROLINA [J].
LANNON, C ;
BRACK, V ;
STUART, J ;
CAPLOW, M ;
MCNEILL, A ;
BORDLEY, WC ;
MARGOLIS, P .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 1995, 149 (10) :1070-1075