The role of protocol layers and macro-cognitive functions in engineered system resilience

被引:7
作者
Amodeo, Domenico C. [1 ]
Francis, Royce A. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Engn Management & Syst Engn, Washington, DC 20052 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Resilience engineering; Critical infrastructure; Layered architecture; Macrocognition; Complexity; Trade-offs; Naturalistic decision making; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; RISK; DEFINITION; COMPLEXITY; AREAS; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2019.106508
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Engineered system resilience has emerged as an important concept for researchers, policy makers, and managers over the past two decades. It is critical to the operation of complex systems that are crucial to social and economic systems, such as interdependent critical infrastructures. While the measurement of infrastructure resilience is well-studied, in this paper the authors present the concept that a system's selected strategy for self organizing is the mechanism for contending with unanticipated events. Self-organizing is a fundamental activity of temporarily modifying system processes and inter-organizational relationships to better respond to a disruptive event. The authors build on existing concepts of how complex systems manage resilience, and illustrate the new concept in the context of transportation networks. If strategies for self-organizing exist, they can be defined and characterized into a limited number of archetypes. This paper develops the concept of self-organizing as an important part of resilience management, and presents two illustrative case studies which are early attempts to characterize these strategies [4]. Understanding strategies for re-organization may help to improve understanding of how traditional resilience metrics are applied or how risk is assessed and managed in complex systems, by providing a context for how decision makers manage responses under uncertain circumstances.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, P 4 RES ENG S SOPH A
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, RESILIENCE ENG CONCE, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315605685
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ENG ECOLOGICAL CONST
[4]   Reflections on the Use of Conceptual Research in Risk Analysis [J].
Aven, Terje .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (11) :2415-2423
[5]   How some types of risk assessments can support resilience analysis and management [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 167 :536-543
[6]   Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation [J].
Aven, Terje .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 253 (01) :1-13
[7]   Multiobjective Stochastic Inoperability Decision Tree for Infrastructure Preparedness [J].
Baroud, Hiba ;
Barker, Kash ;
Grant, F. Hank .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2014, 20 (02)
[8]   The critical incident technique reappraised Using critical incidents to illuminate organizational practices and build theory [J].
Bott, Gregory ;
Tourish, Dennis .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (04) :276-300
[9]   Measuring Flexibility, Descriptive Complexity, and Rework Potential in Generic System Architectures [J].
Broniatowski, David A. ;
Moses, Joel .
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2016, 19 (03) :207-221
[10]   The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research [J].
Crouch, Mira ;
McKenzie, Heather .
SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, 2006, 45 (04) :483-499