Lack of Sex Difference in Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration of Ropivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

被引:9
作者
Pei, Qingqing [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yanqing [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Qin [1 ]
Peng, Zhiyou [1 ]
Feng, Zhiying [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Hosp Beilun Dist, Dept Anesthesiol, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Taizhou Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Linhai, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2015年 / 21卷
关键词
Analgesics; Concentration Camps; Sound; PAIN PERCEPTION; UPPER EXTREMITY; CORNER POCKET; ANESTHESIA; ED50; BUPIVACAINE; SEX/GENDER; INJECTION; SURGERY; GENDER;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.894570
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Sex differences, which may be an important variable for determining anesthetic requirements, have not been well investigated in the aspect of local anesthetic. This investigation aimed to compare the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (US-SCB) between men and women. Material/Method: Patients aged 18-45 years undergoing elective forearm, wrist, or hand surgeries under US-SCB were divided into 2 groups according to sex. The initial concentration was 0.375% ropivacaine 20 mL and the concentration for the next patient was determined by the up-down technique at 0.025% intervals. Success was defined as the absence of any pain in response to a pinprick in the region of all 4 terminal nerves and the skin incision within 45 min. The primary outcome was the MLAC of ropivacaine, which was estimated by the Dixon and Massey method. The analgesia duration, which was defined as the time from the end of the US-SCB injection to the time of feeling discomfort and need for additional analgesics, was observed for each patient. Results: The MLAC of ropivacaine 20 mL for US-SCB was 0.2675% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2512-0.2838%) in men and 0.2675% (95% CI, 0.2524-0.2826%) in women. There was no significant difference in MLAC or the analgesia duration between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: We found no significant sex-related differences in MLAC or analgesia duration of ropivacaine for US-SCB.
引用
收藏
页码:3459 / 3466
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular versus supraclavicular block [J].
Arcand, GV ;
Williams, SR ;
Chouinard, P ;
Boudreault, D ;
Harris, P ;
Ruel, M ;
Girard, F .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (03) :886-890
[2]   Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings [J].
Bartley, E. J. ;
Fillingim, R. B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 111 (01) :52-58
[3]   Sex-based differences in local anaesthetic-induced motor block [J].
Benhamou, Dan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (04) :235-236
[4]   The Corner Pocket Revisited [J].
Brull, Richard ;
Chan, Vincent W. S. .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 36 (03) :308-308
[5]   A comparison of the insertion characteristics of the laryngeal tube and the laryngeal mask airway: a study of the ED50 propofol requirements [J].
Burlacu, CL ;
Gaskin, P ;
Fernandes, A ;
Carey, M ;
Briggs, L .
ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 61 (03) :229-233
[6]   Effect of sex and pregnancy on the potency of intrathecal bupivacaine: determination of ED50 for motor block with the up-down sequential allocation method [J].
Camorcia, Michela ;
Capogna, Giorgio ;
Columb, Malachy O. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (04) :240-244
[7]  
Campesi Ilaria, 2012, Handb Exp Pharmacol, P265, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-30726-3_13
[8]   Drugs and sex differences: a review of drugs relating to anaesthesia [J].
Ciccone, GK ;
Holdcroft, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (02) :255-265
[9]   Evaluation of potential sex differences in the subjective and analgesic effects of morphine in normal, healthy volunteers [J].
Comer, Sandra D. ;
Cooper, Ziva D. ;
Kowalczyk, William J. ;
Sullivan, Maria A. ;
Evans, Suzette M. ;
Bisaga, Adam M. ;
Vosburg, Suzanne K. .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 208 (01) :45-55
[10]  
Cruvinel Marcos Guilherme Cunha, 2007, Rev. Bras. Anestesiol., V57, P500, DOI 10.1590/S0034-70942007000500005