Multi-attribute decision making applied to financial portfolio optimization problem

被引:29
作者
Mendonca, Gustavo H. M. [1 ]
Ferreira, Fernando G. D. C. [1 ]
Cardoso, Rodrigo T. N. [1 ]
Martins, Flavio V. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Fed Educ Tecnol Minas Gerais, Dept Math & Computat Modeling, 7675 Amazonas Av, BR-30510000 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Portfolio optimization; Multiobjective optimization; Multi-attribute decision-making methods; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; SELECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113527
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper proposes an integer multiobjective mean-CVaR portfolio optimization model with variable cardinality constraint and rebalancing and two different methods of decision-maker used to guide and select, according to the decision maker preferences, a solution comes from the non-dominated portfolios generated by a proposed evolutionary algorithm. The decision-making methods were used to approximate investor behavior according to three functions, chosen to represent different investor profiles (conservative, moderate and aggressive). The proposed methods are compared with those found in the literature. Additionally, computational simulations are performed using assets from the Brazilian stock exchange for the period between January 2011 and December 2015. The strategy is that each beginning of the month: the previous portfolio is sold, the optimization is performed, and the decision-making method selects the new portfolio to be purchased. Results of the simulations consider monthly maximum drawdown and cumulative return during the entire study period and show that the optimization model is robust, considering the three simulated profiles. The methods always present cumulative returns above safe investments for the analyzed period, and the aggressive profile obtained bigger gains with greater risk. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]   Generalized asset pricing: Expected Downside Risk-based equilibrium modeling [J].
Ormos, Mihaly ;
Timotity, Dusan .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2016, 52 :967-980
[32]   The A Posteriori decision in multiobjective optimization problems with Smarts, Promethee II, and a fuzzy algorithm [J].
Parreiras, RO ;
Maciel, JHRD ;
Vasconcelos, JA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2006, 42 (04) :1139-1142
[33]  
Pedro L. R., 2013, THESIS
[34]  
Pedro LR, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6576, P550, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19893-9_38
[35]  
Rockafellar R, 2000, The Journal of Risk, V2, P21, DOI DOI 10.21314/JOR.2000.038
[36]  
Silva JD, 2019, SHAKESPEARE AND THE FOLKTALE: AN ANTHOLOGY OF STORIES, P133
[37]   Markowitz-based portfolio selection with minimum transaction lots, cardinality constraints and regarding sector capitalization using genetic algorithm [J].
Soleimani, Hamed ;
Golmakani, Hamid Reza ;
Salimi, Mohammad Hossein .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) :5058-5063
[38]   Suitable-portfolio investors, nondominated frontier sensitivity, and the effect of multiple objectives on standard portfolio selection [J].
Steuer, Ralph E. ;
Qi, Yue ;
Hirschberger, Markus .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2007, 152 :297-317
[39]   A COMPARISON OF WEIGHT APPROXIMATION TECHNIQUES IN MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY DECISION-MAKING [J].
STILLWELL, WG ;
SEAVER, DA ;
EDWARDS, W .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1981, 28 (01) :62-77
[40]  
Vercher E., 2017, REV ELECT COMUNICACI, V18, P1, DOI [10.24309/recta.2017.18.1.01, DOI 10.24309/RECTA.2017.18.1.01]