The Frequency and Causes of Photoallergic Contact Dermatitis among Dermatology Outpatients

被引:0
作者
Spiewak, Radoslaw [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Expt Dermatol & Cosmetol, Coll Med, PL-30688 Krakow, Poland
[2] Inst Dermatol, Krakow, Poland
关键词
photoallergy; photopatch test; photoallergic contact dermatitis; dermatology patients; epidemiology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Too many patients with photoallergy remain undiagnosed due to unsatisfactory knowledge among doctors and limited access to photopatch testing. The objectives of this study were to analyze the frequency of patients requiring diagnostic work-up for photoallergic contact dermatitis among dermatology patients, and to identify the causative photosensitizers. This prospective study involved 1000 consecutive, first-referred dermatology outpatients. All patients with a history of dermatitis induced or aggravated by exposure to light were qualified for photopatch testing. In the study group, 36 (3.6%; 95%CI: 2.4-4.8%) persons required photopatch testing based on their clinical symptoms. As the total number of patients requiring patch tests of any kind amounted to 205, the percentage of photopatch tested patients among all patch-tested patients was 17.5% (95%CI: 12.2-22.8%). Photoallergic contact dermatitis was ultimately confirmed in 15 (1.5%; 0.7-2.3%) persons: 7 females and 8 males aged 6-60 (median 33) years. Nine patients turned out photoallergic to at least one nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, with ketoprofen photoallergy being most frequent (5 patients, in each case clinically relevant), followed by etofenamate (4 non-relevant reactions) and diclofenac (1 relevant reaction). Five patients were positive to at least one organic sunscreen, most frequently to benzophenone-3 (2 patients). "Classical" contact allergy to tested photohaptens was found in 15 persons, including 7 with coexisting photoallergy. In conclusion, patients requiring diagnostic work-up for photoallergy constitute a relevant group among dermatology patients, therefore, it seems advisable that all second-level dermatology referral centers be capable of photopatch testing. Due attention should also be paid to photoallergy in dermatology training.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 235
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   RESULTS OF EVALUATION OF 203 PATIENTS FOR PHOTOSENSITIVITY IN A 7.3-YEAR PERIOD [J].
FOTIADES, J ;
SOTER, NA ;
LIM, HW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 33 (04) :597-602
[2]   A European multicentre photopatch test study The European Multicentre Photopatch Test Study (EMCPPTS) Taskforce [J].
Kerr, A. C. ;
Ferguson, J. ;
Haylett, A. K. ;
Rhodes, L. E. ;
Adamski, H. ;
Alomar, A. ;
Serra, E. ;
Antoniou, C. ;
Aubin, F. ;
Vigan, M. ;
Biedermann, T. ;
Fischer, J. ;
Bourrain, J-L ;
Bruynzeel, D. ;
Rustemeyer, T. ;
Carrascosa, J. M. ;
Chowdhury, M. M. U. ;
de la Cuadra, J. ;
Foti, C. ;
Gardeazabal, J. ;
Gawkrodger, D. J. ;
Gimenez-Arnau, A. ;
Goncalo, M. ;
Goossens, A. ;
Ibbotson, S. H. ;
Dawe, R. S. ;
Lecha, M. ;
Marguery, M-C ;
Neumann, N. J. ;
Niklasson, B. ;
Peyron, J-L ;
Pigatto, P. ;
Spiewak, R. ;
Stone, N. ;
Tanew, A. ;
Thomas, P. ;
Bonnevalle, A. ;
Wilkinson, S. M. ;
Wolf, P. ;
Gruber-Wackernagel, A. ;
Wulf, H. C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 166 (05) :1002-1009
[3]  
Klimanska M, 2011, POSTEP DERM ALERGOL, V28, P203
[4]   Photodermatitis from ketoprofen with cross-reactivity to fenofibrate and benzophenones [J].
Leroy, D ;
Dompmartin, A ;
Szczurko, C ;
Michel, M ;
Louvet, S .
PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, 1997, 13 (03) :93-97
[5]  
Lipozencic J, 2011, ACTA DERMATOVENER CR, V19, P141
[6]  
Plichta Danuta, 2012, Pol Merkur Lekarski, V32, P232
[7]   Systemic photoallergy to terbinafine [J].
Spiewak, R. .
ALLERGY, 2010, 65 (08) :1071-1072
[8]  
Spiewak R, 2012, ESTETOL MED KOSMETOL, V2, P110
[9]  
Spiewak R., 2008, Open Allergy J, V1, P42, DOI [10.2174/1874838400801010042, DOI 10.2174/1874838400801010042]
[10]  
Spiewak Radoslaw, 2007, Expert Rev Clin Immunol, V3, P851, DOI 10.1586/1744666X.3.6.851