Using person-specific networks in psychotherapy: challenges, limitations, and how we could use them anyway

被引:44
作者
von Klipstein, Lino [1 ]
Riese, Harriette [1 ]
van der Veen, Date C. [1 ]
Servaas, Michelle N. [1 ]
Schoevers, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Psychiat, Interdisciplinary Ctr Psychopathol & Emot Regulat, POB 30-001 CC72, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Person-specific networks; Case conceptualization; Experience sampling method; Idiographic models; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; COMORBIDITY; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; MOMENTARY;
D O I
10.1186/s12916-020-01818-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe complexity of psychopathology is evident from its multifactorial etiology and diversity of symptom profiles and hampers effective treatment. In psychotherapy, therapists approach this complexity by using case conceptualization. During this process, patients and therapists closely collaborate on a personalized working theory of the patient's psychopathology. This is a challenging process and shows low reliability between therapists. With the experience sampling method (ESM), time-series data-valuable for case conceptualization-can be systematically gathered in a patient's normal daily life. These data can be analyzed and visualized in person-specific networks (PSNs). PSNs may support case conceptualization by providing a schematic representation of association patterns between affective, cognitive, behavioral, and context variables.Main textWe adopt a clinical perspective in considering how PSNs might be implemented to serve case conceptualization and what their role could be in psychotherapy. We suggest PSNs to be based on personalized ESM assessment to capture the unique constellation of variables in each patient. We reflect on the lack of a gold standard for creating PSNs, which may result in substantially different PSNs and thereby disparate information for case conceptualization. Moreover, even if PSNs are created in a consistent manner, results remain ambiguous as they are subject to multiple interpretations. Therefore, associations in PSNs do not allow for firm conclusions about a patient's psychopathology, but they may nevertheless be valuable in the process of case conceptualization. PSNs are based on systematically gathered, ecologically valid ESM data and provide a unique personalized perspective. When used responsibly, PSNs may be able to support case conceptualization by generating questions that serve as a starting point for a dialog between therapists and patients. Well-targeted questions are an essential tool for therapists to gain insight into the patients' psychopathology patterns and improve the quality of case conceptualization.ConclusionsPSNs have limitations in terms of the reliability of the insights they provide directly. However, taking these challenges into account, we believe they have potential as a tool to help therapists and patients in their collaborative exploration of a patient's psychopathology. Clearly, this would need to be validated in future clinical research.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation - Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey [J].
Andrews, G ;
Henderson, S ;
Hall, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 178 :145-153
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, THESIS COLUMBIA U NE
[4]   An n=1 Clinical Network Analysis of Symptoms and Treatment in Psychosis [J].
Bak, Maarten ;
Drukker, Marjan ;
Hasmi, Laila ;
van Os, Jim .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09)
[5]   CHAOS, SELF-ORGANIZATION, AND PSYCHOLOGY [J].
BARTON, S .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1994, 49 (01) :5-14
[6]  
Bastiaansen J. A., 2019, PSYARXIV, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/c8vp7, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/C8VP7]
[7]   Self-monitoring and personalized feedback based on the experiencing sampling method as a tool to boost depression treatment: a protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (ZELF-i) [J].
Bastiaansen, Jojanneke A. ;
Meurs, Maaike ;
Stelwagen, Renee ;
Wunderink, Lex ;
Schoevers, Robert A. ;
Wichers, Marieke ;
Oldehinkel, Albertine J. .
BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 18
[8]   Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population: results of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS) [J].
Bijl, RV ;
Ravelli, A ;
van Zessen, G .
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (12) :587-595
[9]   Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems [J].
Borsboom, Denny .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 64 (09) :1089-1108
[10]   Insights of Patients and Clinicians on the Promise of the Experience Sampling Method for Psychiatric Care [J].
Bos, Fionneke ;
Snippe, Evelien ;
Bruggeman, Richard ;
Wichers, Marieke ;
van der Krieke, Lian .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2019, 70 (11) :983-991