Structural and Aeroelastic Design of a Joined-Wing UAV

被引:8
作者
Belardo, M. [1 ]
Paletta, N. [1 ]
Di Palma, L. [2 ]
Pecora, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Italian Aerosp Res Ctr, Aircraft Div, Aerostruct Design & Anal Grp, I-81043 Capua, CE, Italy
[2] Italian Aerosp Res Ctr, Aircraft Div, I-81043 Capua, CE, Italy
关键词
Structural design; Structural failures; Tests; Aeroelasticity; Aerospace engineering; Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); Joined wing; Structural design and testing; FLIGHT DYNAMICS; HIGH-ALTITUDE; FLYING WINGS; AIRCRAFT; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000251
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The Italian Aerospace Research Center (CIRA) is currently designing an unmanned aerial research system that is lightweight and has high-structural flexibility, code named the High Altitude Performance Demonstrator (HAPD).The project is framed within the Italian Aerospace Research Program, under the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Chapter. This unmanned aerial system is mainly aimed at developing and validating advanced modeling methodologies for flexible aircrafts. A compendium of the system is provided in this paper, together with a deeper discussion of how CIRA developed the structural and aeroelastic design of HAPD. Some experimental tests performed to validate the main concepts are also presented. The vehicle has an unconventional joined-wing configuration that mitigates undesired extreme flexibility, but that results in a more complicated design. First, aeroelasticity has been taken into account from the preliminary stages of design because flexibility significantly affects aircraft behavior. Second, the HAPD structure is redundant with regard to constraints (because of its joined wing), thus making the internal forces dependent on the stiffness distribution. For these reasons, the availability of an integrated methodology that can support the structural design is mandatory. The output of such a methodology consists of primary structure stiffness distributions (fuselage, wings, and vertical tail), compatibly with the absence of any aeroelastic instability, and structural failure under operative loads.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 111
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   OPTIMIZATION OF JOINED-WING AIRCRAFT [J].
GALLMAN, JW ;
SMITH, SC ;
KROO, IM .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1993, 30 (06) :897-905
[12]  
Hall D.W., 1984, 172313 NASA LOCKH MI
[13]  
Harder R.L., 1972, Journal of Aircraft, V9, P189, DOI [10.2514/3.44330., DOI 10.2514/3.44330]
[14]  
Imperatore B., 2009, P SAE 2009 AEROTECH, DOI 10.4271/2009-01-3127
[15]  
Luber W. G., 1995, P INT FOR AER STRUCT, P291
[16]  
MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, 1998, MSC NASTRAN VERS 7 0
[17]   CONTINUATION AND DIRECT SOLUTION OF THE FLUTTER EQUATION [J].
MANTEGAZZA, P ;
CARDANI, C .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1978, 8 (02) :185-192
[18]  
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Dryden Flight Research Center, 2001, HELIOS PROT DRYD HIS
[19]  
Nickol Craig, 2007, 45 AIAA AER SCI M EX, P1050
[20]  
Noth A., 2007, ADV UNMANNED AERIAL, P378