Proton transfer to nickel-thiolate complexes.: 2.: Rate-limiting intramolecular proton transfer in the reactions of [Ni(SC6H4R-4)(PhP{CH2CH2PPh2}2)]+ (R = NO2, Cl, H, Me, or MeO)

被引:20
作者
Autissier, V
Zarza, PM
Petrou, A
Henderson, RA
Harrington, RW
Clegg, WC
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Dept Chem, Sch Nat Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ La Laguna, Dept Quim Inorgan, San Cristobal la Laguna 38200, Tenerife, Spain
[3] Univ Athens, Inorgan Chem Lab, GR-15771 Athens, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ic0303237
中图分类号
O61 [无机化学];
学科分类号
070301 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The protonation of [Ni(SC6H4R-4)(triphos)](+) (triphos = PhP{CH2CH2PPh2}(2); R = NO2, Cl, H, Me, or MeO) by [lutH](+) (lut = 2,6-dimethylpyridine) to form [Ni(S(H)C6H4R-4)(triphos)](2+) is an equilibrium reaction in MeCN. Kinetic studies, using stopped-flow spectrophotometry, reveal that the reactions occur by a two-step mechanism. Initially, [lutH](+) rapidly binds to the complex (K-2(R)) in an interaction which probably involves hydrogen-bonding of the acid to the sulfur. Subsequent intramolecular proton transfer from [lutH](+) to sulfur (k(3)(R)) is slow because of both electronic and steric factors. The X-ray crystal structures of [Ni(SC6H4R-4)(triphos)](+) (R = NO2, H, Me, or MeO) show that all are best described as square-planar complexes, with the phenyl substituents of the triphos ligand presenting an appreciable barrier to the approach of the sterically demanding [lutH](+) to the sulfur. The kinetic characteristics of the intramolecular proton transfer from [lutH](+) to sulfur have been investigated. The rate of intramolecular proton transfer exhibits a nonlinear dependence on Hammett sigma(+), with both electron-releasing and electron-withdrawing 4-R-substituents on the coordinated thiolate facilitating the rate of proton transfer (NO2 > Cl > H > Me < MeO). The rate constants for intramolecular proton transfer correlate well with the calculated electron dnsity of the sulfur. The temperature dependence of the rate of the intramolecular proton transfer reactions shows that DeltaH(double dagger) is small but increases as the 4-R-substituent becomes more electron-withdrawing {DeltaH(double dagger) = 4.1 (MeO), 6.9 (Me), 11.4 kcal mol(-1) (NO2)}, while DeltaS(double dagger) becomes progressively less negative {DeltaS(double dagger) = -50.1 (MeO), -41.2 (Me), -16.4 (NO2) cal K-1 mol(-1)}. Studies with [lutD](+) show that the rate of intramolecular proton transfer varies with the 4-R-substituent {(k(3)(NO2))(H)/(k(3)(NO2))(D) = 0.39; (k(3)(Cl))(H)/(k(3)(Cl))(D) = 0.88; (k(3)(Me))(H)/(k(3)(Me))(D) = 1.3; (k(3)(MeO))(H)/(k(3)(MeO))(D) = 1.2}.
引用
收藏
页码:3106 / 3115
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A MARCUS MODEL FOR CONCERTED PROTON-TRANSFER [J].
ALBERY, WJ .
FARADAY DISCUSSIONS, 1982, 74 :245-256
[2]  
ALDER RW, 1971, MECHANISM ORGANIC CH, P28
[3]   Protonation and alkylation of a dinuclear nickel thiolate complex [J].
Allan, CB ;
Davidson, G ;
Choudhury, SB ;
Gu, ZJ ;
Bose, K ;
Day, RO ;
Maroney, MJ .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 1998, 37 (17) :4166-4167
[4]   Proton transfer to nickel-thiolate complexes.: 1.: Protonation of [Ni(SC6H4R-4)2(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)] (R = Me, MeO, H, Cl, or NO2) [J].
Autissier, V ;
Clegg, W ;
Harrington, RW ;
Henderson, RA .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2004, 43 (10) :3098-3105
[5]   The role of Mo atoms in nitrogen fixation: Balancing substrate reduction and dihydrogen production [J].
Bell, J ;
Dunford, AJ ;
Hollis, E ;
Henderson, RA .
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2003, 42 (10) :1149-1152
[6]  
BELL RP, 1973, PROTON CHEM, pCH7
[7]  
BIGELEISEN J, 1964, PURE APPL CHEM, V8, P217
[8]  
*BRUK AXS INC, 2001, SMART CONTR SAINT IN
[9]   DISPROPORTIONATION BETWEEN CATION RADICAL AND NEUTRAL RADICAL OF COMPOUND WITH NH GROUP - APPLICATION TO ESTABLISHMENT OF RELATIVE BASICITY SCALE IN ACETONITRILE [J].
CAUQUIS, G ;
DERONZIER, A ;
SERVE, D ;
VIEIL, E .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1975, 60 (02) :205-215
[10]   Kinetic evidence for intramolecular proton transfer between nickel and coordinated thiolate [J].
Clegg, W ;
Henderson, RA .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2002, 41 (05) :1128-1135